Oil Spill: What Will the Storm Do?

As tempests go, tropical storm Bonnie would barely be strong enough to cause a Louisianan to look up from his gumbo. As of Friday evening, the National Hurricane Center actually downgraded Bonnie to a tropical depression, with winds only around 35 mph—below the 39 mph minimum needed for to be an official tropical storm. If this were any other year, Bonnie would be a footnote in what’s expected to be a rough hurricane season.

But 2010 is the summer of the spill, and while Bonnie may not be strong, it’s right on track to hit the site of the Deepwater Horizon spill, as this map from Accuweather shows:

Accuweather.com

Accuweather predicts the storm to reach the spill site Saturday morning, making landfall on the Gulf coast late Saturday night. The storm was strong enough to force BP to halt its relief well operations, with the drilling rigs pulling out late Thursday night. At a briefing on Friday morning, retired Coast Guard Admiral Thad W. Allen that the drilling rigs as well as the Q4000 platform will be moved away from the spill site, out of reach of the storm—and that other ships would follow soon, barring a last-minute swerve from Bonnie. Other ships—the seismic survey vessels, the acoustic survey vessels and the ships that control the remote operated vehicles (ROVs)—would stay longer, in part because they can move faster than the drilling rigs. But because Bonnie relatively weak, Allen expects the work stoppage to be brief—though it will take longer to get the relief well drilling rigs back and ready to work. “If we have to evacuate the scene we’re probably looking at a very limited window, something around 48 hours,” said Allen. “In the meantime our priorities are safety of personnel that dictate the movement of the vessels, and then preservation of the equipment and their ability to come back in and complete their operations as well.”

While the well will remain capped during the storm, if all the vessels have to leave, there will be no real-time monitoring of the well for the first time since the spill began more than three months ago. (The spillcam will go dark!) That’s a little worrying—though the well has remained cap for a week without any serious problems, this is all uncharted territory. Allen said that BP will leave behind hydrophones near the well that will offer some acoustic monitoring of the site—though they’ll only be able to access the recordings once the vessels are back on scene. “Our only real-time feedback will be aerial surveillance and satellite imagery,” Allen said.

The bigger concerns have to do with what the storm might do to the oil spill itself, near the Gulf shores. It could be a positive, as the strong waves created by the storm could naturally break up oil slicks, speeding the natural process of biodegradation and dispersal—like chemical dispersants without the unfortunate toxic side effects. On the other hand, the storm will surely disrupt cleanup efforts along the shore, just as Hurricane Alex did. It will be too rough for skimmers and other boats to operate, and the waves will almost certainly displace the thousands of miles of shore boom that have been laid so far—putting those coastal defense back together will be a headache.

Worse, the storm could drive oil in the water up onto the beaches and further into sensitive marshes along the Gulf coast. So far the damage has been limited to the coastline—in the marshes of southeastern Louisiana, you can see the oil has usually soaked in a few ft. from the water’s edge, but no deeper. A serious storm surge could bring toxic oil and dispersants inland, where it will be far more difficult to clean up. “Sometimes the increased action on the surface can actually help with emulsification of the oil and the distribution and biodegredation,” Allen said. “On the other hand you have the chance that a storm surge can drive that up into the beach and the marshes, where it would not have been driven otherwise.”

So good news/bad news—as it’s usually been with this spill, which is still far from over.

Related Topics: BP oil spill hurricane, BP oil spill storm, BP oil spill weather, Gulf oil spill hurricane, Gulf oil spill hurricane response, Gulf oil spill response storm, Gulf oil spill storm, Gulf oil spill tropical storm, Gulf slick hurricane, Gulf slick tropical storm, Gulf slick weather, Gulf spill weather, Katrina oil slick, Katrina oil spill, oil, oil spill containment hurricane, oil spill containment storm, Oil, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Alexander Demianchuk / Reuters

    Global Warming: An Exclusive Look at James Hansen’s Scary New Math

    A new analysis by the NASA climatologist for the first time ties specific weather events to human-induced climate change

    Victor Fraile / Getty Images

    By Sea, Land and Air: Hong Kong Inventor Leads Charge in War Against Pollution

    One Hong Kong engineer puts the city’s surf and turf to work toward a cleaner future

    Paul Souders

    Can Polar Bears Keep Their Heads Above Water in a Warming World?

    Polar bears are classified as marine mammals, like a seal or a walrus, which might come as a surprise given that they’re usually pictured on land. But polar bears spend a lot of their time in the waters of the Arctic, fishing or swimming among the sea ice. They may look awkward in the water, but no creature with paws is a better swimmer.

  • hereigns7

    The Gulf oil spill, hurricanes, and the recent heat wave have many searching for answers. The internet is buzzing with articles and excellent blogs. But could it be simply the biblical sequence of God’s wrath being poured out upon the earth which is relevant to current events in today’s world. What if we are dealing with the wrath of God? Please understand the wrath of God is letting man slip deeper and deeper into the consequences of their own sin. Please visit my website at http://www.revelation-truth.org . Author of the book Final Warning

  • http://charlieal.wordpress.com charlieal

    The storm will re-disperse widely the oil chemical compounds mixed with the dispersant used by BP. It has been already evaporated by the rain cycle, so those toxic chemicals once re-distributed in land will filtrate underground polluting and turning toxic human drinking waters. Underground waters wells will be polluted, and people who aren’t aware of all the situation will drink the pollutants mixed with the waters and get poisoned and die. It will happen also with the gulf sea foods. EPA is saying that the gulf sea foods are safe, but to me they’re crazy and are laying!!!. Since the oil spill started, the rain cycle has been changing the chemical constitutions of the different chemical compounds that forms the oil and the dispersant, (sun-light, temperatures, other radiations and pollutants already present in the waters due to agricultural processes and industry). All those dangers will be transported inland by Bonnie, and filtered underground, poisoning waters and living organisms.

  • http://bpd100000.wordpress.com bpd100000

    Thank you Mr. Bryan Walsh for asking Admiral Thad Allen about measuring the oil flow rate at today’s briefing. (He gave a really non-responsive answer.)

    It seems to me, with the help of the government, that BP will get away with never measuring the oil flow rate.

    I wonder if you can ask Admiral Allen a follow up question for me?

    Can you ask the Admiral if we can make BP drill a new oil well into Macondo? With an ~8″ riser pipe?

    This way we can get accurate flow rate measurement and not have to spill any more oil into the ocean.

    Or, can they redo the 2nd bottom kill well to tap into the reservior, if it has a big enough riser pipe.

    Or can we let another, more responsible company, drill a well there?

    Somebody’s going to want to tap into that hugh oil reservior sooner or later to get at the millions of barrels of oil that is still there.

    So if the pipe is at least the same size, we can get a good measurement of the oil flow rate.

    This way, we can calculate the $4,300 EPA fine for each barrel of oil spilled accurately.

    BP may be reluctant to drill a new well there. Admiral Allen has said he thinks it only 35,000 barrels a day. Others have said it’s 100,000 barrels a day.

    The difference in EPA fines is $13 billion versus $36 billion for the higher estimate.

    There is still at least $5 to $6 billion dollars worth of oil down there. Experts have said the Macondo could spew 100,000 bpd for the next 2 years.

    For $200 to $300 million a different company can drill a new well to make at least $5 billion. But, if we know the true oil flow rate, it’s may cost BP $23 billion more in EPA fines.

    I would love the chance to drill a new oil well at Macondo!

    This country has been drilling oil wells for over 160 years now, you would think that before the Macondo blew, BP had a pretty good estimate of what the flow rate would be. That’s where they say the 100,000 bpd figure comes from.

blog comments powered by Disqus