Hong Kong Faces Pollution-Driven Brain Drain

AP
FILE - In this Feb. 3, 2007 file photo, women cover her mouths in an attempt to shield themselves from air pollution as they cross a main street in Hong Kong. Hong Kong officials have long blamed Chinese factories in neighboring Guangdong province for the city's worsening air quality. But environmental activists say much of the problem lies at home, and that Hong Kong's limited democracy in which the legislature is stacked with pro-business interests, has thwarted attempts to address local pollution. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung, File)

A new survey released yesterday by Hong Kong’s Civic Exchange found that one in four residents are considering leaving Hong Kong because of the city’s chronic air pollution problems. Over half the people surveyed with post-graduate educations are considering leaving — up 12% from 2008 — along with 37% of university graduates. Only 22% of residents with a high school education are thinking about leaving.

All told, some two million people are thinking about leaving the city because of the near constant blanket of smog that hangs over this famous skyline. According to a Gallup survey cited in the report, Hong Kongers are the most dissatisfied people about pollution in the world.

The urge to flee follows economic lines: Nearly half of the residents who are making  $92,000 or more per year are considering emigrating because of the city’s bad air, whereas only 27% of people making between $30K and 40K are considering, mostly likely because of the cost associated with making that kind of a move.

(Here’s a look at today’s air pollutions levels, if you’re curious. High in every neighborhood listed. I can barely see across the harbor from my office window. And it’s not a big harbor.)

The survey findings is something the Hong Kong government ought to give some serious thought to. As TIME wrote about back in 2007, foreign white collar workers who help run the multinationals that set up camp here have already started opting to live in Singapore over China’s international city for the quality of life — and quality of air — that the island nation offers. Of the Chinese cities, Beijing and Shanghai are, frankly, now perceived as more dynamic places to be. But forget foreigners (many would argue good riddance): the real trouble is if Hong Kong’s best and brightest are considering skipping town, which apparently, they are.

A big part of the problem, as the survey also covers, is that people have lost faith that the government is going to do anything to help them. Hong Kong has shown time and again that when it wants to get something done, it does it. Major land reclamation projects in Victoria Harbor are regularly underway. The public hospital system is respected, and the MTR — our subway — is probably among the most beloved public transportation systems on the planet, and with good reason. You could eat off that floor.

While most people do have faith in the government when it comes to information dissemination and having their best interests at heart, when it comes to lowering the city’s enduring bad air quality, one in five residents does not trust it to set and enforce air quality standards. And public sector workers harbor the highest levels of skepticism. Ouch.

Maybe the government should consider subsidizing Fresh Air?

ALSO: To keep it all in perspective, according to a new list compiled by 24/7 Wall St., we’re only #9 of the 10 worst air cities in the world. Our colleagues in Beijing have it worse.

Related Topics: air pollution, hong kong, China, Cities, Health
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Alexander Demianchuk / Reuters

    Global Warming: An Exclusive Look at James Hansen’s Scary New Math

    A new analysis by the NASA climatologist for the first time ties specific weather events to human-induced climate change

    Victor Fraile / Getty Images

    By Sea, Land and Air: Hong Kong Inventor Leads Charge in War Against Pollution

    One Hong Kong engineer puts the city’s surf and turf to work toward a cleaner future

    Paul Souders

    Can Polar Bears Keep Their Heads Above Water in a Warming World?

    Polar bears are classified as marine mammals, like a seal or a walrus, which might come as a surprise given that they’re usually pictured on land. But polar bears spend a lot of their time in the waters of the Arctic, fishing or swimming among the sea ice. They may look awkward in the water, but no creature with paws is a better swimmer.

  • tanboontee

    Bad air, compounded by dreary, stressful and long-working hours, does help to drive people to near insanity.

    Better quit than deteriorate. We live only once.

  • http://zoromo.wordpress.com brianyam

    I worked in HK for about 8 years. Some days I couldn’t believe how polluted it was. It was if the city was getting bombed. Once I had my first child, I left, and returned to Toronto. HK is a great place. Adventure, taxes are great….but I don’t know why the gov’t has been so stubborn with the clear air issue. The HK air will never be great given where it sits near China, but there are things they can do. When I got back to Toronto and bought an used car, by law you had to get it e-tested. If it failed, the car was pulled off the street. You have to do this every 2 years. Many of the buses here run on gas. The gov’t is now promoting nuclear energy, Wind and Solar. I can’t beleive HK still uses coal at its power plants. Some of the cars/trucks in HK look like they are from the 1980s. Cars are always left turned on while they sit on side streets.

    Its too bad. What HK people need to understand, money is great – but health is important too.

  • http://superbright.wordpress.com superbright

    To be honest, I really don’t trust any of these surveys – they sample all the wrong kind of people, for instance, survey only people who are concerned about these issues only (E.g civic exchange email subscribers). And the way they ask the questions is misleading. While pollution is a problem, it doesn’t dominate my life here – hardly. I think we Hong Kongers are too busy living our lives to care much, I appreciate blue skies, but it IS getting better. I have known no one who has left specifically for pollution, and I’m an expat who has been living here for 13 years – sure maybe it’s a motivating factor – but really – they are making a story out of nothing. The pollution is fraction of what it is in China, and while it is still bad, it is not as bad as couple years ago (no way near as bad).

    And the comparison to Beijing and Shanghai? You’re joking, they are more dynamic? Hong Kong is SO different on so many levels, they are not rivals like news agencies like to present them. And Singapore? Well despite one or two small size firms leaving; a lot more are arriving here – George Soros and all the hedge fund now – you don’t see them flocking to Singapore for ‘clean air’.

    Really, I don’t like pollution as much as anyone, but most days it is fine – and the days it isn’t, well it’s not healthy, it isn’t a leaving factor either.

blog comments powered by Disqus