Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Released in Malaysian Forest

An alternative to mosquito fumigation? (AP)
An alternative to fumigation? (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

A government-run institute in Malaysia announced this week that it had released 6000 genetically modified mosquitoes into an uninhabited patch of forest in December to combat dengue fever.

The experiment, which is now over, was aimed at controlling the local mosquito population by having altered male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes mate with wild female mosquitoes, which carry the disease. The males were engineered so that the females they impregnated would either not have offspring, or have offspring with shorter lives.

Malaysian officials told the AP that it was the first experiment of its kind in Asia. But genetically modified insects have been released into nature before. In the Cayman Islands, GM mosquitoes were released last year with the same goal of reducing the local population (it seemed to work), and in 2006, the U.S. released GM pink bollworms, a common cotton pest, with marker genes in the first use of GM insects in a plant pest control program.

The potential benefits of controlling disease through GM insects are big. Malaria, for which there is no known vaccine, kills at least a million people each year, mostly in Asia and Africa. In some countries where transmission levels are high, the mosquito-born disease is estimated to cost up to 1.3% of GDP annually. Crop and livestock pests, too, have enormous economic impacts. (See pictures from TIME on the global fight against malaria.)

The sometimes-fatal dengue fever, which the Malaysia experiment was designed to target, infects between 50 to 100 million people every year. Though it’s not as dangerous as malaria, it’s been on the rise in recent years; the number of dengue related deaths in Malaysia in 2010 was up over 50% from the year before. Areas where dengue is present often have to deal with regular, noxious fumigations of their neighborhoods. The GM option offers one alternative.

This is a good summary of how the method works from the UK’s Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology. (No GM insects have been approved for release in the EU.)

Population suppression is a method in which insects are engineered to ensure that when they mate with wild individuals no viable offspring are produced. This is achieved by creating GM insects carrying a lethal gene. When they mate with the wild  insects the lethal gene, which is suppressed before release, is passed to the offspring causing them to die. If enough of the GM males were to be released to inundate the wild females this would result in the elimination of the insect population from the area. Most suppression strategies are self-limiting because the lethal genes are designed to kill successive generations,  eventually removing all the GM individuals from the wild.

The genetic manipulation and release of insects, of course, has its detractors, too. Greenpeace, among others, has warned that the unknown risks of unleashing GM insects into the wild outweigh any benefits the technology offers. Critics worry that the space left by the population cleared out by GM popularion control may just give rise to a new mutation or a new disease, and point out that the effects of any experiment using GM insects are impossible to monitor. Existing international GM regulation designed to govern this technology currently only applies to GM crops, not insects, a fact which the parliamentary brief says “may slow down the development of these technologies or deter investment by preventing trial releases.”

Malaysia, for its part has said that its 6000-insect experiment is officially over, and that all the engineered mosquitoes released in the area have been killed with insecticide. They think. Stay tuned.

Related Topics: dengue fever, disease, genetic engineering, malaria, malaysia, mosquitoes, Technology
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Don Farrall

    Falldown: Radioactive Fallout From Fukushima Posed Little Threat to the U.S.

    Nearly a year after the Japanese tsunami and subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant, the good news is that the risk from radiation doesn’t seem to be as high as many initially feared. Take the Pacific Ocean, for example, where most of the radioactive fallout from the plant eventually ended up. Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York’s Stony Brook University, took samples of the seawater three months after the accident. He found levels of radiation that were elevated, but still just a fraction of the amount of radioactivity sea life is exposed to from naturally occurring potassium in seawater.

    Nick M Do

    Gasbag: Why No President Can Bring Us $2 Gasoline

    It’s Presidents’ Day as I write this, so if you were lucky enough to have the day off, give some thanks to Washington, Lincoln and all the other chief executives — even stinkers like James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. Of course in modern American politics, every day is really Presidents’ Day — so central is the occupant of the White House to the perceived state of the nation. Good news or bad news, foreign or domestic, the President gets the credit — and he gets the blame, whether he actually deserves either.

    Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Pipeline Politics: Are the Oil Sands “Game Over” for the Climate? One Study Says No

    There are no shortage of reasons why the Keystone XL pipeline has become such a hot button issue for environmentalists. Many worry about the risks the project could pose to the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, where the pipeline was originally designed to pass. Indeed, when President Obama rejected Keystone XL in January, his stated concern was the potential threat to local water supplies.

  • prabhatmisra

    Good step taken by Malasian government.

blog comments powered by Disqus