UPDATE: Britain Halts Sale of Public Forests

By Eben Harrell | February 17, 2011 | +

Here at Ecocentric, we’ve been covering the British government’s plans to sell of national forests—and the huge public backlash to the plans. Today, David Cameron backed down, as his Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman announced to MPs in the House of Commons that she was halting public consultation into proposals to sell 650,000 acres of public forest by admitting ‘we got this one wrong.’

The U-turn comes just three weeks into a 12-week consultation on the sale, which ministers insisted would actually protect so-called ‘heritage forests’ such as the Forest of Dean and the New Forest. Under the proposals, such forests were to be offered to charities, while ‘locally important’ woodlands would have been offered to community groups. The rest could be sold on the free market.

But the plan angered the British public–more than 8 out 10 disapproved and some 500,000 people signed an online petition calling for a halt to the sale.

It’s rare that such a groundswell of public discontent actually has an effect on government environmental policy. But promising to sell off Britain’s forests hit a nerve, even though 90 percent of the U.K.’s population is based in cities and towns. At Prime Ministers Question’s yesterday, the opposition gave Cameron a good old-fashioned British grilling over the affair. According to an account in the Daily Mail:

Labour leader Ed Miliband seized on the issue at question time in the Commons yesterday, asking the Prime Minister: ‘Can you tell us whether you are happy with your flagship policy on forestry?’

Mr Cameron replied: ‘The short answer to that is no.’

Labour MPs reacted by shouting ‘Timber!’

And thus fell Tory plans for the privatization of Britain’s forests.

@TIME

Latest on Ecocentric

Disasters February 22, 2012

Falldown: Radioactive Fallout From Fukushima Posed Little Threat to the U.S.

Nearly a year after the Japanese tsunami and subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant, the good news is that the risk from radiation doesn’t seem to be as high as many initially feared. Take the Pacific Ocean, for example, where most of the radioactive fallout from the plant eventually ended up. Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York’s Stony Brook University, took samples of the seawater three months after the accident. He found levels of radiation that were elevated, but still just a fraction of the amount of radioactivity sea life is exposed to from naturally occurring potassium in seawater.

Oil February 21, 2012

Gasbag: Why No President Can Bring Us $2 Gasoline

It’s Presidents’ Day as I write this, so if you were lucky enough to have the day off, give some thanks to Washington, Lincoln and all the other chief executives — even stinkers like James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. Of course in modern American politics, every day is really Presidents’ Day — so central is the occupant of the White House to the perceived state of the nation. Good news or bad news, foreign or domestic, the President gets the credit — and he gets the blame, whether he actually deserves either.

Oil February 20, 2012

Pipeline Politics: Are the Oil Sands “Game Over” for the Climate? One Study Says No

There are no shortage of reasons why the Keystone XL pipeline has become such a hot button issue for environmentalists. Many worry about the risks the project could pose to the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, where the pipeline was originally designed to pass. Indeed, when President Obama rejected Keystone XL in January, his stated concern was the potential threat to local water supplies.