The First Nuclear Battery?

 

The cooling tower of a nuclear powerplant
The cooling tower of a nuclear power plant
Michael Dalder/REUTERS

This week I wrote a piece for the magazine on what many energy analysts believe to be the future of the nuclear industry: small modular reactors.

These mini reactors, which generate up to 300 megawatts compared to 1500 megawatts for traditional large nuclear power plants, are all the rage because they are versatile and cheap. My story focused on the smallest of the small reactors–the 25 megawatt Hyperion Power Module (a.k.a the nuclear battery) which Denver-based Hyperion Power hopes will soon fuel subdivisions, mining operations, military bases, hospitals, desalination plants and even cruise liners around the world soon.

But it is a competitor, it seems, that may be the first company to break ground on a commercial mini reactor in the U.S. This week the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) revealed to me that the Tennessee Valley Authority, the U.S.’s biggest public utility, had exchanged letters with the NRC about receiving licensing for two small reactors at its Clinch River site—and the reactors will be designed by Babcock & Wilcox, a maker of nuclear-propulsion systems for the US Navy.

That’s significant because a problem facing Small Modular Reactors is that the NRC is already reviewing a dozen applications for new large reactor designs. The Babcock & Wilcox design, called mPower, is based on existing (but miniaturized) technology. That makes it more likely to have a smooth licensing process than more novel designs, the NRC told me.

The Hyperion Power Module is a new design, which the company says makes it more safe than traditional reactors but which the NRC, while not commenting the company’s claims on safety, says will require the module to undergo a particularly extensive review before it can be licensed.

Hyperion’s executives have expressed frustration at energy conferences about the NRC’s lengthy review process, and have said that it will likely build modules abroad first as a result. Not so fast, say the NRC, as any nuclear technology exported from the U.S. would need approval from several agencies, including the NRC.

So it may be Babcock & Wilcox that wins the race to be the first mini reactor by a U.S. company. Recently Babcock & Wilcox told The Economist that the company’s small reactor offers another advantage on top of mature technology: “Because it can use existing power-transmission lines without overloading them, the mPower can act as a “drop-in replacement” for ageing coal furnaces without the need for costly refurbishment.”

 

Hyperion power’s nuclear battery has all the gee-whiz factor of new technology–and it’s CEO may indeed be proven correct that the reactor is a “game-changer” for the industry. But as of now, it seems that it will be reactor with more a mature and tested design that will likely be the first small reactor licensed in the U.S. by the NRC.

(More on Time.com: See photos of the death of an aging nuclear power plant)

Related Topics: Babock & Wilcox, Hyperion Power Module, mPower, nuclear power, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Small Modular Reactors, Tennessee Valley Authority, Energy
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Alexander Demianchuk / Reuters

    Global Warming: An Exclusive Look at James Hansen’s Scary New Math

    A new analysis by the NASA climatologist for the first time ties specific weather events to human-induced climate change

    Victor Fraile / Getty Images

    By Sea, Land and Air: Hong Kong Inventor Leads Charge in War Against Pollution

    One Hong Kong engineer puts the city’s surf and turf to work toward a cleaner future

    Paul Souders

    Can Polar Bears Keep Their Heads Above Water in a Warming World?

    Polar bears are classified as marine mammals, like a seal or a walrus, which might come as a surprise given that they’re usually pictured on land. But polar bears spend a lot of their time in the waters of the Arctic, fishing or swimming among the sea ice. They may look awkward in the water, but no creature with paws is a better swimmer.

  • prabhatmisra

    The best feature of new module has been well defined by you-………”Because it can use existing power-transmission lines without overloading them, the mPower can act as a “drop-in replacement” for ageing coal furnaces without the need for costly refurbishment.” This will certainly be helpful to the whole humanity. Best wishes.
    Prabhat Misra
    http://www.facebook.com/prabhat.lovepeaceunity

  • briansj3

    For SMR to really work, the regulatory cost has to come down (a lot). This might be possible if the nuclear sector looks outside to how other industries provide assurance. http://processforusability.blogspot.com/2011/02/way-ahead-for-nuclear-renaissance.html

blog comments powered by Disqus