Can Japan Bury Its Nuclear Disaster?

From the beginning, the Japanese response to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster has been a constant improvisation. After the double blow of a quake and a tsunami knocked out power to the plant, officials have desperately tried to keep nuclear material at active reactors and spent fuel pools cool, to prevent overheating and more wide-scale radiation release. They’ve tried flooding the reactors with seawater. They’ve tried using riot control high-pressure water cannons to spray the reactors, and later fire trucks with more powerful hoses. They’ve tried using helicopters to dump water from above on spent fuel pools, which are running dangerously low. There are even efforts afoot to connect long extension cords that might power up the plant’s cooling system again.

As Ken Belson writes in the New York Times, the MacGyver-like nature of the Japanese response to the crisis is either a sign that they were dangerously unready to deal with a nuclear accident on this scale—or that they’re simply trying to do the best they can with an unimaginable situation. Either way, though, more creativity is going to be needed because the disaster seems to be getting worse by the day. On Friday Japan’s nuclear safety agency raised its assessment of the severity of the catastrophe from 4 to 5 on a 7-level international scale, suggesting that the accident may pose a danger for an area beyond the immediate plant. (Three Mile Island was also rated a 5—although there were few long-term effects from the accident—and Chernobyl tops the charts at a 7.) U.S. nuclear executives told American media that they believed there may be damage to the spent fuel pool at reactor 4, which could make it difficult to refill the pool with water. While American data-collection flights sent over the plant showed that severe radiation had not spread beyond the 19-mile zone of concern laid out by the Japanese government—which is smaller than the 50-mile range recommended by the American government—by the weekend winds could shift to carry any radiation in the direction of Tokyo. “This is a very grave and serious accident,” International Atomic Energy Agency head Yukiya Amano told reporters Friday after meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan. “It’s a race against time.”

It might be time for even more extreme measures. On Friday Japanese engineers revealed that they may try to bury the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in sand and encase it in concrete to try to contain any radiation. That would be the last resort of last resorts—one that has so far only been used in the Chernobyl meltdown. Soviet officials there eventually encased the stricken plant in cement, entombing the remaining nuclear fuel—albeit after an explosive meltdown had already occurred. It won’t be easy, though, as a Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) official told reporters in Tokyo:

It is not impossible to encase the reactors in concrete. But our priority right now is to try and cool them down first.

There’s a reason burying the plant would be a last resort, however. It won’t fully work unless Japanese officials have managed to reduce the pressures and high temperatures of the remaining fuel within the reactors. Hot as it is, any sand or cement poured on top of the plant would almost certainly melt. But a physical blanketing of the reactors might at least keep some of the radiation from reaching the atmosphere and spreading. “The preferable strategy is to get water to cover the rods,” says David Lochbaum, director of the Nuclear Safety Project at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “If you have only one option left I would use sand and soil and blanket the material to try to keep the radiation from reaching the atmosphere.”

Lochbaum, for his part, isn’t too optimistic about the fate of Fukushima:

They are facing an unprecedented challenge. They are mobilizing resources, but they don’t have a lot of options. There’s a lot of material in there that could be exposed and not many barriers.

It doesn’t look like this is going to come to a good outcome.

Of course, it’s important to realize that so far, only the heroic workers at Fukushima have likely been put at any risk due to the nuclear accident—compared to the 7,000 people confirmed to have died in the quake and tsunami. TEPCO is working on reconnecting power to the planet by Saturday, which might allow officials to start pumping water back into the reactors and speed the cooling of existing nuclear fuel. But that would require something to go right—and nothing has gone right in Japan for more than a week.

Related Topics: accident, catastrophe, Chernobyl, disaster, earthquake, Fukushima, Japan, meltdown, nuclear, radiation, tsunami, Disasters
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Alexander Demianchuk / Reuters

    Global Warming: An Exclusive Look at James Hansen’s Scary New Math

    A new analysis by the NASA climatologist for the first time ties specific weather events to human-induced climate change

    Victor Fraile / Getty Images

    By Sea, Land and Air: Hong Kong Inventor Leads Charge in War Against Pollution

    One Hong Kong engineer puts the city’s surf and turf to work toward a cleaner future

    Paul Souders

    Can Polar Bears Keep Their Heads Above Water in a Warming World?

    Polar bears are classified as marine mammals, like a seal or a walrus, which might come as a surprise given that they’re usually pictured on land. But polar bears spend a lot of their time in the waters of the Arctic, fishing or swimming among the sea ice. They may look awkward in the water, but no creature with paws is a better swimmer.

  • grmccray

    In the U.S. 3 mile island certainly proved that the lowest bidder wasn’t always the best deal but until this I thought the Japanese were doing better than that.

    Chernobyl in retrospect wasn’t really so surprising and seemed to reflect what could occur in a country with an all powerful government and somewhat less regard for individual human life.

    However, I am genuinely surprised and dismayed that the Japanese government permitted and condoned and that the Japanese corporations undertook such extensive compromises in siting and construction of nuclear power plants that this was ever the possible outcome.

    In the west we have been continuously exposed to the concept of careful and well engineered Japanese products and production techniques and to their apparent regard for human safety.

    Clearly the present looming nuclear disaster has arisen from compromises carried out for expediency and for economic and political reasons.

    These are older reactors and you could argue that they didn’t know enough then to do better, but Tsunamis and earthquakes in Japan as well as earthquake preparedness were certainly understood and prepared for even then.

    Even the efforts at remediation now taking place seem behind the curve and unlikely to be sufficient to accomplish the designated goal of preventing a genuinely significant catastrophic release of radioactive material.

    From what I can see, the Japanese people are now facing the genuine liklihood of a catastrophic release of fissile material that will almost certainly result not only in many thousands of long term cancer deaths but also of permanent loss of use of a significant patch of their limited real estate.

    To say nothing of the long term effect on the neigboring countries.

    A final thought, Fallout dissapates. By the time this gets to the US, it’s effect will be negligible. Send your Potassium Iodide tablets to Japan. They are very likely to actually be needing them soon.

  • tanboontee

    Nothing seems clear at this moment, most people who are in the position of making intelligent comments or public announcements do not appear to be telling the truth. Quite preposterous.

    Ito, a friend from Tokyo, uttered in great distress, “No words can describe this calamity of the worst kind. We are all suffering, in one way or another. But, we shall persevere to endure, and we shall overcome.”

    Yes, we shall always overcome. (btt1943)

  • http://jack-nelson.com Jack Nelson

    Next to last sentence “planet” should be “plant”

  • http://jessecarpenterii.wordpress.com jessecarpenterii

    I hope they can do something fast. I hear California is getting small traces of radiation as we speak.

  • singlemalt64

    The image that we have in the West of careful and well-engineered Japanese products is a partial myth. I’ve lived in Japan for 15 years and can say from experience that the Japanese industrial machine applied this concept to exportable products, but very little of that ethic was carried over into products and industry serving the domestic market. For example, typical Japanese housing remains shoddy and cheap. Car warranties here are also much shorter than they are in North America, for automobiles that are similar.

    Come to Japan and see how, in a typical neighborhood (not the ‘showcase’ neighborhoods where well-heeled expats live), electrical power lines are an overhead spider-web of seemingly jury-rigged wires.

    It is not surprising that the people in charge of those reactors in Fukushima have approached its management with the same low-quality attitude. The appearance of doing a good job is more important than the underlying ethic of actually doing so. They openly admitted that they had no plan should the power supplying the cooling systems fail on all six reactors. Good god, that is an essential! That is a real disaster plan, which is ‘what is the worst case scenario? Power failure to all six cooling systems. What would we do about it?’

    This question was never considered, so now we have the spectacle of a supposedly technologically advanced nation playing McGyver with near-critical nuclear reactors.

    And regarding supposed ‘fallout’ in California, absolutely ridiculous. You’ll receive more radiation from a flight to Hawaii, using your iPod, or sitting in front of your TV than you’ll ever get from the reactor problem in Japan. Do your research before you hit the panic button.

  • annevincent

    Have they considered adding ice to cool the reactors? Or is there not enough power to make enough ice to make a difference?

  • http://ncnuke.wordpress.com ncnuke

    Check out my site for indept articles and GE press releases regarding this nuclear situation. http://www.ncnuke.com

  • singlemalt64

    And perhaps a little lime, soda water, and J.D? You can’t be serious.

  • roddalitz

    This is not a “careful and well engineered Japanese product” but an American GE product.

blog comments powered by Disqus