Shooting an Elephant: Why GoDaddy’s CEO Was Wrong

UPDATE, 3 p.m. Thursday: GoDaddy competitor Namecheap has launched a campaign to woo away offended GoDaddy customers. Our colleagues at Techland have the full story: Switch business now, and Namecheap is offering to make elephant donations on your behalf.

We all shoot vacation videos, but most of us choose to keep them to ourselves — or, at worst, share them with our Facebook friends. Bob Parsons, CEO of the Internet-hosting firm GoDaddy.com, which you know from its lame Super Bowl ads and absolutely nothing else — likes bigger exposure. Parsons recently posted a video of his trip to Zimbabwe, where he shot an elephant. See below:

Now, there are so many things wrong with this video that it’s hard to know where to start. First: Is it really appropriate to score a scene of hungry villagers tearing apart a dead elephant to the tune of AC/DC’s “Hells Bells“? And I can’t be the only one who found it creepy that Parsons outfitted nearly everyone in the area with bright orange GoDaddy baseball caps. Not to mention the fact that this all took place in Zimbabwe, a broken country oppressed by the tyrannical Robert Mugabe, where 64% of the population lives under the poverty line and nearly 100% live in fear. This is one step up from taking a spring break in North Korea.

(More on TIME.com: See pictures of 10 species near extinction.)

But of course the biggest criticism comes from animal-rights advocates who view Parsons’ video — which shows him shooting and killing an elephant, then standing proudly over its corpse — as, well, showing poor taste. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) singled out Parsons for particular abuse:

I am writing to present you with PETA’s first-ever scummiest CEO of the year award (your certificate is on the way). You deserve the award for your egregious disregard for the life of the elephant you shot and killed for your personal enjoyment. Such behavior only shows a poverty of understanding and a deep insecurity, perhaps in your own masculinity. Nonlethal methods are available to protect crops from elephants left hungry because of their disappearing habitat.

Parsons defended himself on his blog, arguing that his target was a “problem elephant” that had been destroying the crops of a nearby village:

I stand by my decision to help African villagers. I believe elephant management is beneficial. I have the support of the people who really matter in this situation, the families of Zimbabwe — people who need help to survive. I have the support of tribal leaders and the government.

Parsons isn’t totally wrong — there is such a thing as “problem elephants,” and human-elephant conflict is a real issue that needs to be dealt with in parts of Africa. From the World Wildlife Fund (WWF):

Not only are elephants being squeezed into smaller and smaller areas, but farmers plant crops that elephants like to eat. As a result, elephants frequently raid and destroy crops. They can be very dangerous too.

While many people in the West regard elephants with affection and admiration, the animals often inspire fear and anger in those who share their land.

Elephants eat up to 450kg of food per day. They are messy eaters, uprooting and scattering as much as is eaten. A single elephant makes light work of a hectare of crops in a very short time.

But that doesn’t mean the best way to deal with this conflict is for rich foreigners like Parsons to make like Hemingway. There are sensible, nonlethal solutions, including using chili- or tobacco-based deterrents to keep elephants out of farmers’ fields, or the simple method of growing crops that elephants don’t like. WWF has more in this issue brief.

(More on TIME.com: See how to save the world’s endangered species.)

It’s worth remembering that people bear at least as much responsibility as elephants do for any conflict, as the continuing growth of the human population puts more and more pressure on elephants. The African elephant is hardly thriving — the International Union for the Conservation of Nature lists it as vulnerable. It’s been a long time since shooting an elephant could be considered fashionable.

See the top 10 heroic animals.

See pictures of animals that can think.

See “The New Age of Extinction.”

Related Topics: Africa, Bob Parsons, elephants, GoDaddy, hunting, PETA, poaching, species, video, wildlife, Zimbabwe, Wildlife
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Don Farrall

    Falldown: Radioactive Fallout From Fukushima Posed Little Threat to the U.S.

    Nearly a year after the Japanese tsunami and subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant, the good news is that the risk from radiation doesn’t seem to be as high as many initially feared. Take the Pacific Ocean, for example, where most of the radioactive fallout from the plant eventually ended up. Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York’s Stony Brook University, took samples of the seawater three months after the accident. He found levels of radiation that were elevated, but still just a fraction of the amount of radioactivity sea life is exposed to from naturally occurring potassium in seawater.

    Nick M Do

    Gasbag: Why No President Can Bring Us $2 Gasoline

    It’s Presidents’ Day as I write this, so if you were lucky enough to have the day off, give some thanks to Washington, Lincoln and all the other chief executives — even stinkers like James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. Of course in modern American politics, every day is really Presidents’ Day — so central is the occupant of the White House to the perceived state of the nation. Good news or bad news, foreign or domestic, the President gets the credit — and he gets the blame, whether he actually deserves either.

    Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Pipeline Politics: Are the Oil Sands “Game Over” for the Climate? One Study Says No

    There are no shortage of reasons why the Keystone XL pipeline has become such a hot button issue for environmentalists. Many worry about the risks the project could pose to the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, where the pipeline was originally designed to pass. Indeed, when President Obama rejected Keystone XL in January, his stated concern was the potential threat to local water supplies.

  • http://lindsayrajt.wordpress.com lindsayrajt

    Amen, Time magazine. Unbelievable that a modern man would be callous and oblivious enough to think that this is a macho or otherwise admirable thing to do. CEO scum of the year, for sure.

  • http://gildataffyapple.wordpress.com gildataffyapple

    Thank you, Time Magazine, for sharing this. Killing an elephant in the middle of the night, and posting it as vacation video?

    Total scum. Great work Time and PETA for calling out this fool.

  • http://kentstein.wordpress.com kentstein

    Thank you Time and PETA for rightfully calling out this scum CEO. I’ll certainly never use GoDaddy as long as he’s in charge.

  • http://timebliog.wordpress.com ramseyf

    Elephants are loving parents, they form deep bonds with each other, and mourn the death of family members. They’re trying to eke out lives in an ever-shrinking habitat. Bob Parsons is a cruel coward. go daddy, indeed…go to hell.

  • http://tomtrnka.wordpress.com tomtrnka

    Bob Parsons = absolute loser

    Please join my efforts at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=630103543#!/home.php?sk=group_212530288757876&ap=1

    and together lets boycott GoDaddy.com.

    I appeal to every domain owner to transfer their business from GoDaddy.com

    Let’s show that actions of one man can and will bring the harsh consequences.

    R.I.P. to innocent elephant

    Thank you

    Tomas

  • wpicotte

    What on earth is wrong with this guy. What a blowhard jackass.

    If you need an example of what we SHOULD be doing for elephants, there’s this:
    http://www.biglifeafrica.org/latest_news

    Bob Parsons needs an education – sign him up for poacher patrol.

  • bluknight01

    Bob Parsons deserves to be shot in the head.

  • http://meanster358.wordpress.com meanster358

    I would support GODADDY.COM

  • http://meanster358.wordpress.com meanster358

    He went to a village where the elephants were causing mass destruction, brought a means to and end and provided the village with meat for probably weeks and allowed their village to continue to produce their crop. Only to be shamed when posted in the US. I thought helping the less fortunate was a good thing. Apparently I stand corrected. Clearly he should have just tried to “shooo” the elephant away and build massive fences to keep the elephant out, of which the elephants would have laughed at and immediately destroyed.

  • http://elaines111.wordpress.com elaines111

    Thanks, Time. This is a prime example of how humans can’t share the planet with other species. And we’re supposed to be civilized! I hope all of GoDaddy is embarrassed by this man’s cruelty and moves in a more compassionate direction. This is sickening!

  • omegawolf747

    Maybe if people would quit breeding and building villages farther and farther into elephant territory, the elephants would stop raiding their crops. The elephants were there for centuries before the villagers were.

  • http://kbrosen.wordpress.com kbrosen

    Thank you, PETA and Time Magazine for sharing this. I’ll no longer be using GoDaddy for my business.

  • http://rebecbec.wordpress.com rebecbec

    Very well-spoken. Choosing human rights over animal rights is not necessarily shameful, but the manner in which Bob Parsons advertised his actions was distasteful, at least. With all of his fortune and privilege, you would think he would choose a less primitive and more compassionate way to truly make a difference.

  • http://tlc3030.wordpress.com tlc4000

    Thank you Time and PETA for exposing this cruel idiot. There is always a way to live in harmony with others without stooping to cruelty and violence. Locals should be helped by showing them how to peacefully handle problems and make lasting changes in their farming techniques to save crops from damage without having to resort to disturbing, soul-wrecking violence.

  • http://sodisgustipated.wordpress.com sodisgustipated

    Yes, you are right. Clearly this man shot the elephant to “help the needy”. What a saint, he is. In fact, all of the worlds problems should be solved by taking a gun and shooting stuff.

  • http://sodisgustipated.wordpress.com sodisgustipated

    Thank you Time and PETA. This dude is a total d-bag and I will never support anything or anyone that supports go daddy. Besides the fact that their CEO is total scum, their commercials are freaking annoying and stupid.

  • http://sodisgustipated.wordpress.com sodisgustipated

    Well its a good thing you dont have a pair of tusks…

  • mooninnorfolk

    That video made me sick to my stomach. Elephants are highly intelligent and social animals, not to mention endangered. I read an article about how killing mature bull elephants is causing a generation of “juvenile delinquent” elephants who don’t have strong father figures, if you will. In other words, macho jerks like Parsons are doing more harm than good (if in fact they are really doing any good at all).

  • helenasoh

    Scummiest indeed! I hope everyone that uses GoDaddy sees this video and takes their business elsewhere. Finding pleasure in shooting wild elephants is despicable. Thank you TIME and PETA for denouncing Bob Parsons!

  • http://2020mis.wordpress.com craig123abc

    What a disgusting person. I can’t think of a more warped value system than to think that killing animals is fun.

    I will be moving all of my clients websites off of this creep’s company as soon as it’s feasible. I’m sure no one will have a problem with it. Hopefully others will do the same.

    There are many other options out there for web service providers with much better performance at affordable prices. Let’s do the world a favor and boycott GoDaddy!

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    The clueless people are the other of this blog post and the commenters here.

    While I am not a big GoDaddy fan, Mr. Parsons did not just traipse over to Africa and find and elephant and shoot it. The Zimbabwe conservation officials made the decision that this elephant needed to go. In order to foster and improve the elephant herd, occasional culling is required. This is a fact of conservation. Instead of a conservation officer doing the deed, they earn revenue, to help fund further conservation efforts, like pay anti-poaching officers who really protect wild elephants, by selling special hunting licenses to wealthy Westerners who pay $25k or more for the privilege. The hunting fee goes into further conservation, the meat is used by poverty stricken villagers, and the wild elephant population is improved through the culling deemed necessary by conservation SCIENTISTS.

    Instead of listening to the PETA wackos, I’d rather listen to real scientists who are involved in conservation science.

    It is not like some affluent suburb moved into the jungle and encroached on the elephant population with a new shopping mall. We are talking about African villagers, who se forefathers have probably been there for many hundreds, if not thousands of years.

    The internet commandos posting and commenting hear should educate themselves before spouting off and foaming at the mouth about something they have no clue about.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    That should have said: “posting HERE”. Sorry.

  • http://sab2797.wordpress.com sab2797

    Shame on CEO Bob Parsons and his heartless, irrevocable behavoir! Better believe I’ll be boycotting ‘Go Daddy’ from now on. Kudos to PETA and Time for bringing this terrible story to light.

  • hemplover

    There are no problem elephants. Humans are the problem.

  • http://ffernando58.wordpress.com thethinker1958

    I saw a documentary on how villagers stop killing elephants, start collecting their dung and managed to produce high quality hand-made paper, with demand by professionals. Now the villagers love their elephants.

    Hey, godaddy’s CEO… be creative you stupid animal killer!

  • tjp44

    this is disgusting! Period. Go Daddy is dead for this. if your such a tough guy Bob Parsons, how about you and go 10 rounds in the name of the elephant you killed and glorified you lack of manhood by detailing the corpses demise. i am in California, look me up and i will crush you
    Long Beach
    562 384-4520

  • http://imominous.wordpress.com imominous

    This clown embodies the worst sort of American male, from his bimbos to his stupid ads, to killing wild animals. Bet he loves NASCAR as well.

    He is a despicable sort of man-child of the same stripe as that ‘Girls Gone Wild’ dude.

    His life is composed of superficialities that impress other males. He may attract a bevy of Anna Nichol Smith types, not unlike Charlie Sheen; superficial women attracted by bling and influence.

    What a shallow, spiritually vacant fellow!

  • http://stevedot76dotcom.wordpress.com sheller76

    FACT:In 1977 Kenya banned hunting and has never reopened it. The elephant population fell from 130,000 to 17,000.

    FACT: Tanzania closed hunting in 1973 and reopened it in 1978 after poaching reduced its elephant population by over half. Once hunting reopened, the elephant rebounded to a current population around 125,000.

    So which is better for the elephants?

    Two reasons this is true: Two things: money (that elephant cost the CEO a fortune to shoot, and the money from that fuels reason #2) #2 oversight: with the money brought in from hunting, governement (that are extremely poor) can afford to prevent poaching.

    Wake up people, the world doesn’t run itself in a cozey, disney type, feel good way. It is a cold sometimes brutal place.

    HUNTING IS GOOD!

  • http://boonesferry.wordpress.com boonesferry

    His goal was definitley not one of humanitarian but one of extreme ego and arrogance. If he were truly concerened about the village people and their crops he would have reasearched the issue and used some of his vast wealth in a humane and ecologically resposible way…not a gun.

  • http://e2verne.wordpress.com e2verne

    I appreicate your comment and point of view, and factually you’re correct – Mr Parsons found himself a place where acting like the Big White Hunter was still tenable. He, and his supporters, can salve their consciences with the “we did good for those villagers” mantra. But, the astonishing brutality of Mr Parsons’ actions coupled with the distressing arrogance indicated by his posting the video prevent many of us from congratulating him on his feat.
    The ignorance of the villagers is not an excuse for Mr Parsons’ ignorance.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @boonesferry

    You should get a clue. Mr. Parsons is not the one who decided to shoot the elephant. The Zimbabwe Conservation SCIENTISTS made that decisions. He just purchased the hunting license they offered for the privilege to cull the elephant that the scientists decided needed to be culled. That raised REVENUE which they otherwise would not have had, which goes to further conservation efforts including funding anti-poaching officers.

    All the bleeding heart clueless internet imbeciles posting here really amaze me. The safety of anonymity, sitting in front of your PC, posting about things you have no clue on. Great fun. Made in America.

  • http://stupidecoterrorists.wordpress.com stupidecoterrorists

    Stupid ecoterrorists! Who do you think funds protection of the elephants and other game?! Hunter licenses, you animal rights freaks! This CEO paid over $25,000 for the tag to kill that elephant. That $25,000 goes directly to the local population. The locals see that the game has value and defends them against poaching. How much money does PETA spend on wildlife enhancement? NONE! How much do hunters contribute to wildlife enhancements? BILLIONS!

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @e2verne

    The only ignorance is yours. The villagers are not ignorant. This hunt was put on by the Zimbabwe GAME CONSERVATION SCIENTISTS who made the decision that this elephant needed to be culled. Mr. Parsons paid the money that goes to fund anti-poaching and other conservation efforts that protect the elephant and other African wildlife. Instead of their own officer shooting the elephant, they used it to raise money for further conservation efforts. The elephant would have been culled anyway so why not raise funds to protect the elephants from poachers and other threats?

  • http://joepal128.wordpress.com joepal128

    this is no big deal… people have been killing animals and fish forever to survive… The villagers were able to eat a meal, and he has a trophy for his get-away camp… This is really not where we should be focusing our attention! How about GE CEO Jeff Immelt, president Obamas main man, who reported 12 billion in profits, and paid 0 in taxes~! now that makes me angry! Kill 10 more elephants, I would rather the rich pay taxes… so the poor and middle class can actually get a break!

  • http://stupidecoterrorists.wordpress.com stupidecoterrorists

    Hey stupid – who protects the elephants from poachers?
    The hunters dollars.
    Without hunters, the elephant would be extinct by now.

  • http://stupidecoterrorists.wordpress.com stupidecoterrorists

    typical PETA fool…threatening the life of a human. You freakin ecoterrorist!

  • http://stupidecoterrorists.wordpress.com stupidecoterrorists

    PETA kills over 10,000 animals per year…why is that? Because they are an organization that feeds on your emotions for money.

  • http://cheesehead956.wordpress.com cheesehead956

    I’m just glad its not a GODADDY VIDEO THAT CUTS OFF IN THE GOOD PART LONG LIVE GO DADDY

  • http://cheesehead956.wordpress.com cheesehead956

    I AGREE WITH YOU PEOPLE GOT TO EAT THE ELEPHANT DIDNT GO TO WASTE BUT TO GUTS AND BETTER A DEAD ELEPHANT THAN A DEAD TRIBE

  • flylikeido

    Lets say we had a cougar that was attacking bikers and stalking children on a trail in Colorado. I wonder would these same people be so upset that the cougar was shot and killed? I doubt it.

    In Africa elephants are a very dangerous animal and these local tribes consider them to be pests. I do not see a problem removing problem animals and injecting funds into a third world country.

  • http://huxleytheman.wordpress.com huxleytheman

    Why does eveyone over-react?
    We all love to eat beef and pork every day and thousands of cows and pigs are slaughtered every day in the US. You think the cows are kissed in the slaughter houses to get you the ground meat?

    What is the big deal in killing 1 trouble giving elephant. It does not make sense to me as the species cannot go extinct!!
    I know it is wild life, so what?
    Only the one who don’t eat meat, chicken or sea food, are eligible to comment about this! That is my opinion. So just enjoy your burger or steak this evening.

  • http://affableman.wordpress.com affableman

    The guy isn’t too bright but then Godaddy or more commonly called, “Blowdaddy” is the worst web host out there.

  • http://choward5400.wordpress.com choward5400

    He killed an animal and fed a village. Get over yourselves… Elephants are magnificent creatures at the zoo, but in Africa, they’re 5 ton armadillos that eat 1,000lbs of food in one sitting. This is nature. Those people swarmed that carcass like ants and the elephant will continue the circle of life.

  • detroitice

    tip44……….if I could afford it I’d fly out there and buy you dinner.

    Anyone who thinks killing an elephant…. or any animal….in this manner, needs to see a doctor. As others have mentioned, elephants are one of the most intelligent beings on the planet. Their capacity for love and their sense of family is astonishing. The only reason there are rogue elephants is because humans, the so called “smartest species”, completely obliterated their habitat. It is my fondest wish that before this planet burns out, animals somehow retake what is rightly theirs. I refuse to watch this video, but I join others in saying GoDaddy is an absolute loser. Below is a wonderful passage from an article by Henry Beston (1928) regarding elephants:

    ” In a world older and more complete than ours, they move finished and complete, gifted with extensions of the senses we have lost or never attained, living by voices we shall never hear. They are not brethren, they are ot underlings; they are other Nations, caught with ourselves in the net of life and time.”

  • rickyk1

    Wrong, less nowland is undercultivation in Zimbabwe than 10 years ago. Population of Zimbabwe is going down not up.

  • http://affableman.wordpress.com affableman

    Because if you knew anything about this, wildlife biologists or rangers should have done it not some fatcat from the U.S.

    We don’t allow just anyone to put down troublesome bears or mountain lions. That’s why it’s wrong.

  • rickyk1

    There are many millions of hunters in the US, it is fun.

  • http://boonesferry.wordpress.com boonesferry

    OK, so I went off and researched the issue and as much as I hate to say it, culling may be necessary. The elephant population is growing faster than the land can support. They are eating themselves to extinction. If left alone they would eat every last bit of vegiation on the land and then they would all die of starvation.

    Another option, If the Kenyan government weren’t averse to applying economic incentives to protect its wildlife, it could buy Zimbabwe’s excess elephants to replenish Kenya’s disappearing herds.

    In the end, I do not believe Bob Parsons is in any way a humanitarian. I see him as an extremely errogant egomaniac.

  • rickyk1

    Tell that to the elephant walking through your back yard

  • aromey84

    I have no problem with Bob Parsons or any person shooting elephants, provided it’s for food or to keep the species of animal from harming humans’ well being. But I do have a problem with the poor taste in which this video was shot and edited. Scoring it with Hells Bells and outfitting the locals in GoDaddy gear shows a serious lack of empathy and respect for another culture – one which is in dire need of humanitary aid and care.

  • rickyk1

    No different from getting a tag for an animal here in the US

  • http://stupidecoterrorists.wordpress.com stupidecoterrorists

    affableman is clueless. Do some research on this issue before you open your pie-hole …you dolt.

  • http://choward5400.wordpress.com choward5400

    Funny… After watching the Life series, it would appear most alpha male animals exhibit this exact behavior. Then of course, the smaller, weaker male animals pout with their mate-less lives.

  • http://stupidecoterrorists.wordpress.com stupidecoterrorists

    PETA kills more animals than this man will ever kill in his lifetime….do a google search….PETA kills animals. They’ve killed 10′s of thousands each year…and you people still give them money…amazing how stupid you bleeding heart sheeple are…

  • aromey84

    Well said, I agree for the most part.

    What it comes down to is, these PETA talking heads and animal-rights freaks are individuals who don’t like humans and don’t relate with humans. So they anthropomorphize things like elephants.

    Sorry folks, but we as human beings are higher on the food chain. That doesn’t give us the right to eradicate an entire species of animal, but if we want to kill an elephant or two for food, its within our rights as human beings.

  • detroitice

    Speaking for myself, it’s not hunters I have a problem with. It’s people who dress up like hunters and use it as a costume just so they can kill things. Real hunters respect the enviornment and the animal. Real hunters wait till hunting season and follow the law. Real hunters don’t hunt endangered animals. Bob Parsons is not a real hunter, he is an idiot.

  • http://choward5400.wordpress.com choward5400

    Are you crazy? Most states have a lottery for trouble animals like that. I don’t think you know what you’re talking about…

  • http://choward5400.wordpress.com choward5400

    Welcome to Nature… Where smug, civilized self-awareness may give you insight and piece-of-mind, but it doesn’t put the bacon on the table.

  • http://missalex01.wordpress.com missalex01

    replying to the if the cougar attacked noone would be mad, WRONG! People move into areas where wildlife has lived since forever, stay out of those areas. So with this, if the great white hunter had just stayed away from the entire continent of Africa, people would not be starving or allowing this type of ignorant behavior. Its not just Americans its every country that went there, drew lines and divided up the country so they could steal the gold and diamonds. So this was a clear attempt at free advertizing and using starving people to justify he greed. So killing a cougar, elephant or stray dog, some humans need to be hunted to extinction!!!

  • http://choward5400.wordpress.com choward5400

    Human life above all.

  • http://boonesferry.wordpress.com boonesferry

    Yes, thank you.

  • serialtrainer

    I think it would’ve been more appropriate to build defensive ways to combat the elephant rather than shooting it in the head. Did he do some good? Yes. But could he have done good in other ways? Absolutely. Understandably, villagers are living in poverty and we want to help — What has Mr. Parsons done to help in the long term? Has he taken the money he makes from GoDaddy and set up a trust fund? Has he done anything to promote awareness of this country other than donning a rifle? Don’t go on about him doing a “humanitarian” thing. Any destruction of our ecosystem is bigger than “one troublesome animal” — and pardon me but are they going to shoot every elephant wandering onto the property? I’m disgusted. When dogs wander onto my lawn, I don’t shoot them..and YES I shoo them away. If there were racoons, or snakes, I’d call an expert in to take them to a refuge or someplace they can make a home. If the SCIENTISTS said “hey come over and eat our villagers!” would people be so understanding about our CEO’s standing over a dead person’s body triumphantly?

  • cleareye1

    We now have an excellent opportunity to express ourselves via the free enterprise system:

    DO NOT do business with GoDaddy.com.

    Other ego challenged ‘men” will learn a valuable lesson!

  • http://arrowchucker.wordpress.com arrowchucker

    Can’t argue with that logic… So, if I follow you, you’re gonna run right out and shoot yourself in the head… Right?

  • http://shallowhal.wordpress.com shallowhal

    That was awesome! I wonder how elephant tastes? Ill take a huge rib!

  • http://ponnvandu.wordpress.com/ ponnvandu

    Quite apart from all this, it is the national parks and forest rangers’ job to deal with any problem involving wildlife and man-animal conflict. This gentleman is mistaken to assume that he has to go and be the savior of Zimbabwean villagers as if the Zimbabwe government and people are so totally incompetent as to require his expert and apparently voluntary work. Questions that have to be asked are, was he licensed to carry firearms? Was he licensed to shoot the elephant? and many more come to mind. The day of the great white hunter are over. The local government should prosecute people who break the law… or who try to take the law into their own hands

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @affableman

    Actually, if you had a clue you would know that in the US, many of the troublesome animals are actualy taken by private sportsmen (hunters).

    The elephant is just as dead when a ranger shoots it as a sportsman. The difference, is that instead of being a cost hole for the local (probably underfunded) wildlife conservation authorities (paying the ranger, his equipment, etc to do it), it can be a plus in the funds column which helps them fund future conservation efforts.

    It is a win-win for everyone.

    The real issue I think is that you have a problem with people who can afford this kind of “sport.” We have income envy. You are not worried about a dead elephant (since it is OK for a ranger to shoot it), you are worried that someone could pay $25k for a hunting tag.

  • http://arrowchucker.wordpress.com arrowchucker

    Intelligent? Seriously? And dolphins are too I suppose.

    Do they cure disease, cultivate their own food, create art, establish societies?

    Don’t equate instinctual behavior with intelligence.

  • http://hingie68.wordpress.com hingie68

    Sure, we will just give the whole world over to animals. While I do not condone killing an African Elephant, only an idiot would prefer an animal to survive over humans. You people are a bunch of PETA loving whack jobs. May be you should not have been born so mice and rats could make their homes in the field where your house is. What a bunch of demented idiots.

  • http://stkittchick.wordpress.com stkittchick

    This is despicable, shameful and flat-out sadistic.

    What kind of monster gets pleasure out of blasting these gorgeous and threatened animals to death?

    Sick, sick, sick.

    Goodbye, GoDaddy!

  • http://hingie68.wordpress.com hingie68

    Gee, Your such a tough guy! I am shaking in my shoes! Your an embarrassment to society Mr. Macho Man! What a joke you are. Go ahead, threaten me too, I need a good laugh today! Idiot!

  • http://hingie68.wordpress.com hingie68

    I will be transferring all of my domains TO GoDaddy.com. As long as the Elephant is being used for food to feed hungry people then I am ok with it. Ecowackjobs need to go pound sand!

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @detroitice

    Do you think there is an elephant hunting season?

    Mr. Parsons followed all the laws and did this according to and under the direction of the Zimbabwe conservation officials.

    Very few elephants are culled each year and it is all done according to science, and the law of each land.

    The real problem is poachers, which Mr. Parsons very expensive tag help to fund against.

    Please, get a clue before posting in public. It is embarrassing.

  • http://hingie68.wordpress.com hingie68

    I wonder how a smoked elephant rib with lots of bbq rub would taste? MMmmmmm, sounds awesome!

  • http://jose2jose.wordpress.com jose2jose

    you all need to stfu, none of your business to interfer with other peoples business and lifestyles. So what he shot a frgn elephant it wasn’t like it’s the last on the planet and he fed a whole bunch of starvn zimbabwe people. You bleeding arse libs need to remember people and there food supply is more important than a stupid animal. So what if elephants go extinct who besides dung beetles and people will care. zero negative impact just positive results cause they won’t be arount to destroy food supplies. Go Daddy! You got my web business and you will be keeping it.

    PETA
    People Eating Tasty Animals

  • http://informedamericancitizen.wordpress.com informedamericancitizen

    The video was presented in a less than tasteful manner, no argument there… but the article is worse. Nothing like the misrepresentation of information to fuel the uninformed.

    Elephants vulnerable? Maybe 50 years ago. Contrarily, CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) encourages the harvesting of elephants in Zimbabwe, among other places. CITES allows Zimbabwe 500 permits a year, or less than half of 1 percent of its population. In Zimbabwe alone, harvesting of elephants generates $15 million a year.

    …There are sensible, non-lethal solutions, including chili and tobacco-based deterrents…??? Really? They should just run right down to the Zimbabwe supermarket and get what they need? Or, they should not grow the food they depend on so the elephants will not come around?

    To fully dispute all inaccuracies in this article would take forever….

  • http://mayo211.wordpress.com Richard Allen

    this is a difficult issue. i know all the PETA people are going nuts. I would say he is a jerk for shooting it for sport…if that was his original intention, then that’s pretty crummy of him. However, the locals were able to butcher the beast and I am sure they used every bit of that animal in some way so it’s not all bad. He fed probably a few hundred people with that kill so I have to commend him in an odd way for that. I guess i am not exactly indifferent, but its hard to completely condemn him. I am sure the locals see him as a sort of hero for his action.

  • kingjoe1

    If people would spend more time helping people instead of complaing about them this world would be a better place. This guy did nothing illegal and something for 99.9% of the time humans have roamed the earth, no one would have blinked an eye towards. However in these self righteous times we have far too many couch cowboys/girls doing nothing but pointing out what they feel is wrong with everyone else.

  • Better Together Fan

    The video uses the soundtrack from Full Metal Jacket, which I thought was odd. That’s the song that played in that movie in the scene where Private Pyle kills Gunnery Sgt. Hartman, then himself.

  • http://realopinionated.wordpress.com peartbasura

    Instead of killing elephants to feed a village why doesn’t he give some of his wealth to feed a village!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • http://karlh64.wordpress.com karlh64

    Unless you’re a Vegan and wear only natural fibres you need to get real. Animals are killed for food. It’s a fact of life and death. To kill a problem elephant is an ethical treatment of an animal. It protects lives and crops. To kill an elephant and feed an entire starving village is also ethical even noble. Add to that all the people he no doubt hired to stage his hunt and there are a lot of spin off benefits for the local economy.

    The problem is the rich west is that our steaks come from aisle 4 in the supermarket and we never see the live animal that is killed in a slaughterhouse to make it. Your veal comes from a calf that is killed while young. Your leather shoes were also walking around on their own at one point.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @peartbasura

    He did use his wealth to feed a village. You don’t think it was free to shoot an elephant do you? He spent big bucks to help the Zimbabwe Wildlife authorities cull an elephant.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @ponnvandu

    Do you really think Mr. Parsons did this outside the law? He paid the Zimbabwe authorities big bucks for the right to hunt an elephant as part of their wildlife management activities. Everything he did was perfectly legal.

  • Billy

    Gee thanks, Bryan Walsh, for your expertise on African farming.

    “There are sensible, nonlethal solutions, including … the simple method of growing crops that elephants don’t like.”

    Let me get this straight, your advice is to tell people living in countries with very high poverty rates to stop growing nutritional crops like Paddy Rice, Maize and Wheat (which elephants love for obvious reason, like their high protein levels)??

    Well done! Why don’t you be the first to send them some chili seeds to plant with a nice note explaining their nutritional value.

  • http://kopmaestro.wordpress.com kopmaestro

    Actually, killing an elephant is illegal. It’s illegal in Botswana, so I’m sure it is in Zimbabwe too. Also, killing an elephant has been an issue for a long time and it is something that people in Southern Africa are trying to stop. Just an FYI.

  • http://jimmymakrs.wordpress.com jimmymarks

    Guns seemed to have worked pretty well for the Americans back in 1776, no?

  • okparrothead

    It just matches his Barbie Babe, Hot Rod, cowBOY persona. It’s just overcompensation.
    A new genus of Man: Homo Ignoramus

  • http://jimmymakrs.wordpress.com jimmymarks

    wonder how you feel about Americans pushing the Native Americans out of the way…

  • http://www.twitter.com/richardSoper Richard

    So he killed an animal that ruined crops, and the people ate the animal? Whats the problem? The animal was not killed just for the sake of killing, it was killed to protect a food source, and in turn became a food source. You PETA people make no sense. You’d rather dozens of people starve while wild elephants destroy their crops? Does that make ANY sense?

    And please, SOMEONE explain to me how you get 3 full grown elephants relocated without force? What, tranquilizers and transport trucks? Are you going to pay for it? Because no one in Zimbabwe can afford that, what they can afford is a gun to protect their crops.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @kopmaestro

    Actually, killing an elephant in Botswana is not illegal. Nor it it in Zimbabwe. When you have a hunting permit. Poaching is illegal (killing one without a permit).

    Use your favorite search engine to search for “botswana elephant hunting” .

    And something here as well http://lb.vg/gK142

  • http://konakat.wordpress.com konakat

    Pretty straight forward. How much good PR if he spent some GoDaddy bucks to relocate the E – bet its a fraction of what he pays the GD bikini team. This act spits in the face of a good number of his customer that are appalled by it. His intention was to go to Africa and shoot an Elephant, not feed villagers encroaching on E habitat. The ends do not justify the means.

    Soon to be former GoDaddy customer, gun owner and hunter. G

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @konakat

    Somehow I doubt you are a hunter, or if you are, you understand the least bit about hunting. You obviously do not understand Africa and Elephants. Nor what actually happened.

  • http://www.twitter.com/richardSoper Richard

    Are you Bob Parsons? No? Then you dont know what his intentions were. Please stop trying to speak for someone you dont even know.

  • http://jose2jose.wordpress.com jose2jose

    WTF you talkn about, better go back and review. FM
    J was 60′s music not Ac/dc. The only tune during that scene as a couple repeating notes.

  • http://dmo55.wordpress.com dmo55

    GoDaddy is never going to get any of my business, especially with someone like Bob Parsons running it

  • http://kristihines.wordpress.com kristihines

    I think the issue here is that he probably wasn’t sitting around thinking “I think I’d like to go and help people save their crops by doing something humanitarian and shooting an elephant.” It’s that he obviously wanted to go hunt big game and found it “fun” to go shoot this animal. Because people who are out culling animals for the better good aren’t posting it as part of their “woo hoo, look what I did on vacation” video collection.

  • imjack123

    all you people are overreacting. hunting has and always will be a part of some peoples life, either for sport, or need. the elephants he was hunting were PROBLEM elephants, meaning they were most likely a danger to people. the photo with him and the elephant is something every hunter takes after they kill an animal, something to remember the hunt by. We need more people like bob parsons in this world. peta is overreacting as usual and getting into business that isn’t theres. he was not breaking any laws, and no, zimbabwe is not one step short of north korea.

  • http://insightsofmind.wordpress.com insightsofmind

    It’s sad to see another being killed but I can understand the reasoning behind it. We just need more efficient ways of keeping elephants out of crop areas without having to kill them.

  • imjack123

    nothing he did was illegal, and im pretty sure you have done something you shouldnt have recently, such as be speed while driving or something similar. so now your scum. and now im calling you out

  • imjack123

    YOU GO BOB PARSONS!

  • http://plummew.wordpress.com dumpsterdiverlad

    All those people are still hungry! Parsons should go shoot some more elephants for them!

  • http://trottocanter.wordpress.com trottocanter

    Privilege to cull? First of all, why not just say kill which is what cull means? Maybe because it sounds to awful. Why is it a PRIVILEGE to kill an animal? You people on here saying that need therapy. You are one step away from being serial killers. What this rich freak did is reprehensible- jeez, stop making it sound like what he did was O.K. There is no way to twist this around to make it right. Forget it.

  • http://dougthecarczar.wordpress.com dougthecarczar

    What a dirtbag. I’ll register my new domains with anyone BUT you.

  • http://davidcoal.wordpress.com davidcoal

    It’s not a crime to kill an elephant.
    It’s bigger than all that.
    It’s a sin to kill an elephant.
    Do you understand? lt’s a sin.
    It’s the only sin that you can buy
    a license and go out and commit.
    ______–Clint Eastwood in White Hunter, Black Heart

  • detroitice

    Wow, Richard, how dare you contradict Mr. Bag, who knows all, sees all, and for all we know (which is not much apparently) set this whole thing up just so he could call the rest of us idiots, and bleeding hearts.
    I actually feel bad for him, he’s not someone I’d want to know.

  • http://erick1961.wordpress.com erick1961

    Great shot, take me hunting next time. How do I sign up for Go Daddy?

  • http://derickflint.wordpress.com derickflint

    Bob Parsons is a very, very little man. Killing an elephant with a gun and standing over it like he’s great for doing so shows just little he understands what life really is and what it means to be alive. But he’s just like a lot people who only think about themselves and are ignorant about the whole world around them and how so much of it has changed for the worse for most other creatures on the planet.

    How sad and ironic when a rich person with a gun goes and kills what was probably a magnificent animal who was just trying desperately to eat and live. The scene at the end with the locals tearing the animal apart doesn’t say good things about humans as a group either.

  • http://racetoextinction.wordpress.com racetoextinction

    As stupid as this may sound to all of you… I cannot wait until ALL the animals (and plants) are extinct and we are the only living thing left. Now THAT will be an interesting scenario. We allow our governments let people torture and kill everything in their path yet we have a law for everything when it comes to our paper money, cars, stocks, houses, etc etc.

    We are the dumbest creature in the universe. The absolute dumbest.

    So I say kill everything, please… keep killing… this will put a permanent end to ALL animal suffering one day, a day that I can’t wait to arrive. That is the day we will no longer kill innocent animals that are FORCED to share this planet with us… and we will be forced to look back at what we did wrong — that will be the only time each and every individual will have to face reality and man up to what happened… but probably not. Humans really suck the big one… we are the universe’s WORST mistake.

    I cannot wait for our own extinction, I cannot wait….

  • http://stilly04.wordpress.com stilly04

    This was a sanctioned kill that was overseen by conservationists and, according to a ‘real’ news source, two members of the ‘government’. This is a VERY common practice in countries like this and provides a fairly significant amount of the conservation capital these countries struggle to produce. Some of you say build a fence, find another way, well, in Africa, there isn’t money to “find another way”. There are no resources for “defensive” measures. If you are a member of an impoverished village and your food source is being destroid you defend it. It is that or starve to death. Welcome to Africa.

    I can understand the emotional reaction to seeing an animal as magestic as an African Elephant killed in such a arrogant fashion. Americans associate Elephants with intellegence, caring and icons like Dumbo and some of the named beasts we have seen at the circus and zoos.

    While this guy is quite obviously an egomainiac, with an undoubtedly small penis, what he did isn’t considered wrong by African standards. Just like you walk into the supermarket and grab pizza rolls for your fat kids. Just another day. This animal didn’t die in vain. It didn’t die on some pleasure hunt dispite the impression this troglodite gives off. It died to save a village. We should honor this elephant, just like the villagers will do before they eat it.

    I think we all forget, on a regular basis, we can not possibly comprehend what happens in third world countries. I can say with all confidence, as I’ve visited several, 90% of the people posting thier strong, sometimes nasty, opinions here wouldn’t last a week in the remote parts of Africa. 45% of those wouldn’t make it 24 hours.

    Is Parson’s guilty of incredibly bad taste and further damaging the already horrible western reputation? Yes. Should he lose his business or be baraged with threats from organizations like PETA? No. Especially not from PETA.

  • http://stilly04.wordpress.com stilly04

    We are still thousands of years away from the event you so long for. I’d start working on the science to increase human life ten fold first then pray for your own destruction.

  • http://hellotiki.wordpress.com Fred Barnett

    Well I’m disgusted. And it’s time for my website on GoDaddy to depart to splitsville Daddy-o.

  • http://zelda0434.wordpress.com zelda0434

    First of all, I agree, he is probably a pompous ass who is trying to self-promote.

    BUT, the elephants were dangerous, the villagers wanted them gone, if they planted crops elephants do not like or did something else to deter them, they would just endanger others elsewhere or starve. Is that better?

    This looks like a win-win situation for all concerned. He got his hunting trip and got to pretend it was a humanitarian effort. I am sure he paid the villagers as guides, so they made some money. The villagers did not have to worry about this elephant any longer. And they all got a good nutritious meal. (it wasn’t just a trophy kill).

    Who cares if these poor people got free hats?

    Everyone else can get a grip and relax.

  • http://vorticist.wordpress.com vorticist

    Just add Parsons thrilling little sad adventure to the long list of crappy things associated with GoDaddy. I will transfer my accounts from them tomorrow. Should be enjoyable since my whole experience with them was bad from day one. Just try navigating through their portal to accomplish anything other than renewing or buying a service. You’ll end up concluding the things was constructed by a child in its logic or by a sleazy programmer doing their damnedest to rip you off. Thanks for culling the herd Bob.

  • slsmile

    This is the best reply I’ve seen. While I agree that his subjective intent and his glorification of the killing of the elephant were at the least crass/tasteless, THE ACTUAL KILLING of the elephant wasn’t wrong/unethical/illegal by the standards of the country that it was done in. But people in first world should keep in mind that they don’t live in Zimbabwe, they don’t live in that village, that they can outrage and stamp their foots while living in comparative luxury to the rest of the world. I have an issue with people transplanting their outrage over something that would be unacceptable and unneccesary in the first world and trying to make it seem that way in the third world. No. Just no. – Signed – A third world transplant living in the first world.

  • http://karlh64.wordpress.com karlh64

    One point to clarify. Herds in the first world need to be culled too. If deer, moose or elk herds are not controlled you run into the same problems where they overpopulate their food source and in a bad winter you lose the entire heard. With man creeping in on their natural habitat more and more we need to manage the herds and make sure they don’t overpopulate. And also when a bear wanders into twon and becomes dangerous to people sometimes they need to be killed. The msot active group in actually working toward this that I’ve seen is Hunters believe it or not. Most environmentalists simply scream leave nature to the animals and then go home to their houses in the country where forests were clear cut to make room for their property.

  • Staff Writer

    If you actually read the article you would learn that there are ~non-lethal~ methods of preventing elephants from being a problem and that elephants are becoming endangered, so no – this is no overreaction. His actions are completely unnecessary and considering how much money he has to his name – I am sure he could have done something good with his money in that small village. Instead, he decided to have some fun shooting an elephant and patting himself on the back for it, what a goon.

  • http://mustang355.wordpress.com mustang355

    I abhor the killing of elephants for sport which is what this is no matter the rationalization. There are many organizations who will plant chilli peppers for the impoverished farmers, which is highly effective. Zimbabwe used to have a great record of conservation and incredible game reserves. Unfortunately their dictator has absolutely impoverished the country, getting rid of all agrifarming in favor of subsistence farming on racial grounds. It used to be a country that fed much of impoverished Africa with it’s grain exports and now is starving. The spread of subsistence farming and poaching has led to elephants and all other game being decimated in that country as it has led to more encounters with elephants in particular as the fences have come down from poaching, lack of funds and for scrap metal. It is not like the country was always poor and starving. And to put go daddy caps on the hungry black masses while they are hacking away at the elephant is shameless advertising in it’s most perverse form.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    If you would actually do some research you would find out that you are wrong. Culling of elephant herds is vital to keeping them strong and vibrant. Those areas that practice sound management, including culling, have stronger elephant herds. Those that don’t, have dwindling elephant herds.

    Elephants are not endangered in Zimbabwe and they have legal cull hunts every year for small numbers.

    Do your research.

  • http://amorpheous.wordpress.com amorpheous

    Bob Parsons has always been a joke, with his tradeshow models that look like hookers (they really love you Bob even if you didn’t shovel money at them) and his ridiculous posturing as Pimp Daddy Bob. GoDaddy got big because he undercut everyone’s prices. Then they jacked up their prices to the highest level they could get away with once they owned the discount domain registation business.

    So what is Mr BlowDaddy doing now? Using his corporate profits to live out his fantasy (and it is a fantasy) of being sexy, macho and 30 years younger. Killing elephants is the act of a pompous narcissist hoping to convince people that he’s a great big powerful manly-man and somehow deserves adoration. Instead he’s just showing himself to one step away from being Charlie Sheen.

    Bob’s justification seems like the same pretense that Japan uses to kills whales and dolphins.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    While I agree that the dictator in Zimbabwe has impoverished his nation, that has nothing to do with this. In fact, most of these countries use the money raised through these cull-hunts to fund ANTI-poaching conservation work. What Mr. Parsons did has nothing to do with poaching.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    I sense envy here.

    And btw, the whales that Japan kills are not endangered either. There are tons and tons of minke whales and they are in no way endangered.

    Just a bunch of busy bodies sticking their nose into other people’s business.

  • http://gazog.wordpress.com gazog

    Give it a break people, I am betting there would be less concern if he had killed a Human! get over it folks as far as I am concerned he did what needed to be done and its not like it went to waste!

  • http://dcmuniz3.wordpress.com dmuniz3inca

    oooh yeah tomtrnka… you’re going to single-handedly bring down go dady.com with your facebook effort. wow. you’re every man’s hero… or a stupid idealist who stomps his high heeled pumps, huffs and puffs and blows… literally. you blow.

  • http://cheezerie.wordpress.com cheezerie

    In the late 1900s the British along with other Europeans nations went to Africa in the great Africa land grab and killed 10,000s of people let alone animals and elephants.

    The American colonialist is an interesting beast because they believe that they are the first to discover the world where ever they go.

    No matter what the elephant/s did does there is one important question to be asked? Whose planet is it? Our planet or the animals planet? Humans are unable to live alongside animals in certain parts of the world. I certainly would not put the welfare of an African farmer above that of an elephant. What right has any human got to kill an elephant regardless of the problems caused by wild animals to local farmers. Humans have invaded the jungles, forests and grasslands of these animals and these farmers must make their peace with these animals.

    The CEO of an American company killing an elephant to protect a village sounds absolutely absurd. Who says the CEO of this company has more right to live than the elephant he shot?

    What a cold blooded wanker the CEO of GoDaddy must be and defending a village in Africa. What nonsense.

  • http://jrpblog.wordpress.com James

    I made the solution to go with Network Solutions a while back. Seeing this, I’m very glad I did. Killing for “sport,” no matter what the justification, is small-minded and immoral. Poor man. Hopefully he’ll be reincarnated into an elephant after his up-coming heart attack.

  • http://merennulli.wordpress.com merennulli

    First off, anyone boycotting because of this probably wasn’t in the target audience of their risqué commercials to begin with. I seriously doubt him shooting an elephant will have an appreciable impact on his business.

    Nor should it. Let’s say by some fluke a boycott has its intended effect and hurts the business – who pays for it? The CEO who went hunting, or the rank and file employee who gets laid off?

    As for what he actually did, CEO’s have a long history of doing something vaguely helpful to the world on their own time and posing for photos to boost their image. It’s always self-promotion, but it’s also always an attempt to have a positive impact. Reading the comments here, the assumption seems to be that you can’t choose something you might enjoy when trying to help people.

    To the matter of shooting an elephant vs transplanting it or deterring it, there are pros and cons to each approach. You’re starting from the assumption that the elephant’s life is of greater value than any possible downside of the cons. I do question the authority of someone sitting in an air conditioned box in North America to dictate what is appropriate for a village living in direct contact with these creatures in the wild. If they choose to tell the rich tourist “kill this elephant for us please”, that’s their choice.

  • http://jrpblog.wordpress.com James

    When the animals are all dead, the rich will start to hunt the poorer members of their own species “for sport.” The poor and underprivileged will become the “problem animals.” Elephants can’t shoot back, but humans can. It’s probably time for those on the “endangered species list” to start taking the offensive instead of hiding in the bush waiting to become prey. Think about it.

  • slsmile

    The ignorance of the villagers? WHAT. Well of course, they’re poor and live in a third world country, they must be inferior to you and all of the first world. I mean, we can’t hold them responsible for their own actions (like they answer to you) because they just don’t know any better. *facepalm*

    Oh, first world. Why do you suck so much and are so out of touch with the real lives of people who are not as privileged as you?

  • slsmile

    The ignorance of the villagers? WHAT. Well of course, they’re poor and live in a third world country, they must be inferior to you and all of the first world. I mean, we can’t hold them responsible for their own actions (like they answer to you) because they just don’t know any better. *facepalm*

    Oh, first world. Why do you suck so much and are so out of touch with the real lives of people who are not as privileged as you?

  • http://conversationofdiscovery.wordpress.com shmittykenj

    As there article says, there are so many things wrong with this video.

    I am disgusted by this guys statement of “helping the people that really matter” -Key word PEOPLE. He clearly believes that humans are dominant and have free rein to rape and squander anything we desire without and reprocussions.

    The fact is we are part of a system, a large global system, and of any number of systems on a less grand scale. Human beings are constantly attacking, and altering the the functions of these precious systems that we depend on for our way of life. People like this guy need to go back to school on what it means to be alive, and the impact their frivalous choices have on the long term survival of the human species and all the other species on this planet.

    I find it ridiculous that in a time of so much loss of biodiversity this moron would honestly suggest that the best course of action is murdering this elephant. Did they even try relocating it to a preserve or national park ? Did he invest in conservation and educations for the locals on the best way to handle problem elephants without having to euthenism them? -I guess that would probably cost a lot more than a riffle and a couple shells though. (I wonder if he’s hurting for cash…)

    As for the local people, of course I am concerned with thier basic human rights and acknowledge a problem when their crops are being destroyed. However, the video it’s expresses that the elephant carcus was not enough to feed to whole village, so can you even call it a short term solution. Did this low life consider the over consumer of western society and deficient amount of aid provided to developing countries? If he really cared he would donate proceeds of his empire to funding a longe term plan for growth and self seficiency of the local people. He killed that elephant out if his own desire to feel powerful. (You’re real tough with your big gun ..coward).

    I can never comprehend that at the same time, in the same world, one man can live in luxury and another has to fight thier neighbours for meat just to survive. If this rich guy cares so much about people in developing countries why doesn’t he feed them? – I know one man can’t save the world, but I believe he can choose to help better it, or drive it further into misery.

    Bob Parsons and his choice to murder and innocent animal who has no where else to go as man takes over it’s natural territory without concern for it’s future tells me that he has chosen money of the future humanity and what it means to be good. His statements after the fact, make me think my judgment of his character was correct.

  • http://robroyramey.wordpress.com robroyramey

    There are a number of low-tech, non-lethal, methods that have been developed and successfully used to reduce elephant-human conflict. These include the use of chili pepper paste on string fences, chili pepper “bombs” (a mix of peppers and elephant dung that are lit to produce a noxious odor), capsicum sprays, and even vuvuzellas. Higher-tech, non-lethal deterrents are in the works to reduce human-elephant conflict even further. Many of us are involved in these efforts, and in research to understand the root causes of conflicts involving crop raiding, aggressive interactions, and destruction of water wells. To learn more about African elephants and deterrent research, go to: elephantpepper.com, namibia-elephant-protection.com, negt.org, savetheelephants.org, and wildlifescienceintl.com.
    Rob Roy Ramey II, Ph.D.

  • http://fivewphoto.wordpress.com skymyrka

    in the video, i saw more crops destroyed by villagers in goDaddy outfits carving up slaughtered elephant than what ever damage the animal could have ever done alone.

    that said, it was a sadistic thrill under a “humanitarian” pretense (aka PR damage control). If goDaddy’s CEO was really looking to help the people, there are much wiser ways to invest his abundant fortune into things other than guns and adrenaline junkie expeditions.

  • http://www.sacredsummits.sg reviveramesh

    what a moronic act – he has no business to do this and he is showing off something like this and posting videos – what’s wrong with this man…

    like many people have said there are many other ways to solve the problem in zimbabwe and the cruelty in this case is awful and totally unnecessary..

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @reviveramesh

    Do some research. You will find out how wrong you are. This was a govt sponsored cull shoot done for conservation purposes.

  • http://gotdinged.wordpress.com gotdinged

    Close minded, one sided thinking from some, keep the world in a backyard style of life.”Third World” It feed a lot of people and did away with one problem child…GET over It…

  • http://gotdinged.wordpress.com gotdinged

    Did you read what you wrote before you posted it, “THIRD WORLD” suoermarket, Pizza Rolls, How stupid…
    You took way to long to write your Idiotic comment, Get a Life…

  • http://gotdinged.wordpress.com gotdinged

    The People who came and cut up the Animal did more damage to the corps then the Elephant. They should have moved the animal in small pieces to a different location.
    The reason for killing the Elephant was the destruction to Corps…

  • http://stilly04.wordpress.com stilly04

    I think the better question to ask is did you read what I wrote? The second question I would as is did you comprehend any of it?

  • http://stilly04.wordpress.com stilly04

    This statement is not accurate. The Japanese have permission to kill ANY whale they come across up to a certain number. That includes endangered whales. Their justification to the world press is they don’t kill ‘many’ of the endagered ones.

  • http://bigamhuntr.wordpress.com bigamhuntr

    Some of these comments are the typical uninformed morons that we as hunters are dealing with. They are passionate with their opinions but they have no idea about elephants, what they do to destroy the landscape, the numbers of them left, and what the hunters money does to help the local economy much less the meat that is given to the local tribe.

    This was a Problem Animal Control hunt or PAC as they are called. What happens on those type hunts is simple. The local area where the hunt is conducted will either have too many elephants or an actual problem animal that is destroying crops, killing people, coming into their village, etc. Those animals are typically young teenage bulls that are big enough to be a problem and not scared of humans.

    Once an animal like this is discovered, the tribal chief will contact the Professional Hunter (PH) that has a contract with the tribe to hunt their land and tell him that they need some elephants killed. The PH will then contact his client list and find a hunter to come and shoot the PAC animal.

    A PAC hunt like this is typically around $7-12,000 for a bull elephant and $4-6,000 for a cow. The PH will get about 30% of the hunt cost and the rest goes to the tribe.

    All of these animals are non-importable. That means that none of the animal can be brought back into the U.S. The hunter can’t have the tusks, skull, hide, feet, and not even the tail. The tribe gets the entire animal and they sale the body parts to various trading company and you saw what happens to the meat. It appears in the video that is a mob and they are fighting over the meat. That may happen but most of the time you will have tribal butchers and the meat is evenly distributed to each family. The reason that so many people in that video are there is because they have nothing else to do.

    Before some of you start bashing the killing of an animal, maybe you should do some research.

  • http://onforcesolar.wordpress.com charlesf1

    I have pulled my 40 domains from Go Daddy. Parsons should be shot. This guy is scum.

  • http://acatonmykeyboard.wordpress.com misterpurr

    Go Daddy–straight to hell.
    Really horrendous. There are other ways to solve elephant’s need to eat. They do not make a distinction between food and “crops.” Anyone who has any doubt about the souls and minds of elephants should watch this short clip from a National Geographic special about elephants:

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    Yet more ignorance and emotion over fact.

  • http://swimminca.wordpress.com swimminca

    This is a trophy hunt to slaughter an elephant pure and simple. To say that it’s an act of public service to the people of Zimbabwe is pathetically transparent!!
    If you read the article you’d know that Robert Mugabe’s government is totally corrupt. Bob Parsons must have bribed a lot of people.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @swimminca

    If you had done any research you would find out that it is normal and typical that a small number of permits are given out to hunters by governments in Elephant countries in Africa for conservation purposes. Elephants are not endangered in Zimbabwe and they hunt up to 500 a year with the blessing of international organizations. Yes, the hunters are trophy hunters, because it provides additional revenue to cash strapped conservation departments in Africa to do it that way. No bribes needed.

    Do a little research, like some other readers have done and come back and admitted the facts after learning about Elephant hunting in Africa.

  • http://boonesferry.wordpress.com boonesferry

    Exactly!
    A persons’ motives say a lot about the person.

  • http://anunfortunatejourney.wordpress.com thissalantine

    …Wow, um, yeah. I’m going to show this article to my husband first thing this morning and make sure he transfers our respective companies’ business to someone, anyone, other than godaddy. This is the final straw in over four years of rude customer service and double billing. And if you REALLY want to help the locals, you jackass, try setting up an organization to train them with skills that will allow them the self respect and self sufficiency gained when able to provide for oneself and ones family. That video of those people swarming around a carcass only serves to make you look like a swaggering hillbilly with a loaded weapon and too much money. Let me join the wave of people severing ties with your company and taking my money elsewhere.

  • http://chadbag.wordpress.com chadbag

    @thissalantine
    If you had done any research, jackass, instead of just being an emotional twit, you would find out this was a government sponsored Elephant hunt and was not at the behest of Mr. Parsons. The wildlife officials have to sometimes cull and they get wealthy westerners to pay to help them to do it which improves their wildlife management budget and gets someone else to pay for the dirty work.

blog comments powered by Disqus