Good News for Greens: Science Goes Global

Finally, some good news for environmentalists. China has become the second most dominant publisher of scientific research in the world and within a few years will overtake the U.S., according to a new report.

The People’s Republic published 163,000 of the world’s 1.5 million research papers in major peer-reviewed journals in 2008, compared to the U.S’s 320,000, according to the report published by the Royal Society, Britain’s national science academy. By 2013, China will overtake the U.S. on that metric of scientific progress, the report finds. The reason? China’s spending on R & D has grown 20% a year since 1999 and now stands at $100 billion a year. The country also now produces around 1.5 million science and engineering graduates a year.

These figures are in line with a larger trend of investment in science in developing countries. Brazil and India, too, have seen major increases in scientific productivity in recent years. Globally, spending on science  increased by 45% between 2002 and 2007, which is roughly in line with global GDP. However, in the developing world, it’s gone up by over 100%.

That, my Green friends, is very good news. Why? Most of the biggest challenges facing the world today are global and environmental: Climate change, food security, biodiversity, water security and energy security, to name but a few. These problems require science to fully understand and technological innovation to overcome, and the more minds and more labs we have working on them the better. What’s more, climate change will likely be most severe in the developing world, so it makes sense to have scientific institutions in place there. As Chris Llewellyn Smith, director of energy research at Oxford University and the chair of the Royal Society’s study, tells Ecocentric, “global problems require global solutions.”

Even more heartening still, the report, titled “Knowledge, Networks and Nations,” lays out how collaboration has increased in recent years. In every part of the world international contribution to  scientific literature–as measured by the number of multi-authored papers with contributors from different countries–is increasing. Again, that’s great news for the green movement, because most environmental problems are borderless. Indeed, the report suggests that, thanks to information sharing and communication technology, it is no longer accurate to anticipate centers of enlightenment such as Edinburgh in the 18th century or Baghdad in the 8th century. Future periods of enlightenment will now be global. “The growth in overall collaboration globally indicates that the scientific landscape is increasingly interlinked. The level of collaboration may differ proportionally between countries, but it is clear that it is intrinsic to science on both a national and global level,” the report states.

Even papers published by authors in a single country may now have an international flavor, says Llewellyn Smith. “In the UK, for instance, there are 4.5 million foreign-born residents, and 20% of them have a scientific or engineering background. It’s no longer accurate to talk about ‘brain drain’ but ‘brain circulation,’”  he says.

Llewellyn Smith, himself a former director of the CERN particle physics laboratory in Switzerland that set a record last year with a paper that had authors from 32 different countries, also told Ecocentric that international scientific collaboration has an added benefit when it comes to climate change: “If we are going to reach agreement on major global challenges it helps if all regions of the world–particularly less developed countries–are at the table analyzing the problems and designing solutions.”

Most of the top ten scientific countries—as measured by the number of papers published— are major Western powers: UK, Germany, Canada, Italy, Spain, France, U.S.; but along with China and Japan, India joined the top ten by displacing Russia in 2008. There were also surprises in the developing world. Iran, for instance, registered the fastest-growing number of publications of any country on the planet. The number of research papers in Iran rose from 736 in 1996 to 13,238 in 2008. And the Islamic Republic’s government  committed to increasing R&D to 4% of GDP by 2030, up from just 0.59% in 2006.

Related Topics: China, Global Science, Royal Society, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Don Farrall

    Falldown: Radioactive Fallout From Fukushima Posed Little Threat to the U.S.

    Nearly a year after the Japanese tsunami and subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant, the good news is that the risk from radiation doesn’t seem to be as high as many initially feared. Take the Pacific Ocean, for example, where most of the radioactive fallout from the plant eventually ended up. Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York’s Stony Brook University, took samples of the seawater three months after the accident. He found levels of radiation that were elevated, but still just a fraction of the amount of radioactivity sea life is exposed to from naturally occurring potassium in seawater.

    Nick M Do

    Gasbag: Why No President Can Bring Us $2 Gasoline

    It’s Presidents’ Day as I write this, so if you were lucky enough to have the day off, give some thanks to Washington, Lincoln and all the other chief executives — even stinkers like James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. Of course in modern American politics, every day is really Presidents’ Day — so central is the occupant of the White House to the perceived state of the nation. Good news or bad news, foreign or domestic, the President gets the credit — and he gets the blame, whether he actually deserves either.

    Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Pipeline Politics: Are the Oil Sands “Game Over” for the Climate? One Study Says No

    There are no shortage of reasons why the Keystone XL pipeline has become such a hot button issue for environmentalists. Many worry about the risks the project could pose to the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, where the pipeline was originally designed to pass. Indeed, when President Obama rejected Keystone XL in January, his stated concern was the potential threat to local water supplies.

  • http://8020vision.com jaykimball

    Last year China passed the US in windpower installations. They are committed to advancing energy R&D on all fronts.

    Last year the US spent more on potato chips than energy R&D. With hopes of changing that, seven business leaders, founders of American Energy Innovation Council, delivered a Business Plan For America’s Energy Future. I wrote a post on it, and include a video from the council. It is informative and the initiative is worth our support. See:

    http://8020vision.com/2010/09/10/top-business-leaders-deliver-clean-energy-plan/

    Jay Kimball
    8020 Vision

  • http://csminsights.wordpress.com Nick Kellingley

    It’s worth noting that China’s commitment to clean energy is unparalleled – mainly because pollution levels are already life inhibiting for a vast chunk of the population.

    But it’s not just traditional green energy which is getting the investment there’s also 138 nuclear plants on the cards. We’re offering a free report on the current state of China’s nuclear industry from our website:

    http://www.chinastrategicmonitor.com/free_china_nuclear.html

    Nick Kellingley
    China Strategic Monitor

blog comments powered by Disqus