Sigh. The GOP Cites “Global Cooling.” Again

There ought to be a special place in honesty jail for people who say presposterously wrong things publicly — and know full well they’re doing so. If such a place exists, it’s time to turn down Newt Gringrich’s bed and place a mint on his pillow, because he’s headed there for a long stay.

Last week, on a tour of New Hampshire, the stumbling presidential candidate came out against — surprise! — the idea that climate change is really happening. And — surprise again! — he cited the oft-repeated trope about scientists in the 1970s who warned that the world was on its way to a big-chill era that they described as “global cooling.”

Quoted by Politico.com, Gringrich said: “Now many of those scientists are still alive, and they were absolutely convinced. I mean, if Al Gore had been able to in the 1970s, we would have been building huge furnaces to warm the planet against this inevitable coming Ice Age.”

Having cited Boogeyman #1 for the climate-change deniers (Gore), Gingrich took the next required swipe, at intellectuals and government: “Now, if you were a left-wing intellectual, climate change is the newest excuse to take control of lives, and you want a new bureaucracy to run our lives on behalf of the newest thing.”

Let’s put aside for a moment the fact that Gingrich is considered by many people — none moreso than himself — to be one of the great brainiacs of the GOP. On matters of science, that might be a little like being the skinniest guy at fat camp; still, no one wears the “intellectual” laurel more proudly than Newt, even if he doesn’t always use the word. What’s more, this “newest thing” he speaks of has been under study by climate scientists for close to two generations now, and while I haven’t followed every word of the discussion, I’m pretty sure that at no point in all of the talk about droughts and storms and melting polar caps and dying polar bears has any scientist cried out, “Forget all that, the important thing is to set up a new bureaucracy that can run our lives.”

Finally, Gingrich cited a new National Academy of Sciences report confirming, for the one-jillionth time, that yes, climate change is occurring, yes it’s human-driven and yes it’s a mortal danger. ”I’m not discrediting or disputing the National Academy of Sciences,” the former Speaker said as he set about discrediting and disputing the National Academy of Sciences.  ”I’m saying a topic large enough to change the behavior of the entire human race is a topic that is more than science and deserves public hearings with very tough-minded public questions, and we’ve had almost none of that on either side.” Absolutely true — provided you believe that the one thing that’s been lacking in climate politics over the past 40 years is a public argument about whether or not global warming is real and what to do about it.

But back to that global cooling thing: The former Congressman (R, Tiffany’s), is absolutely right that at one point in the 1970s, some scientists did believe it was taking place. Then, as other scientists looked more deeply into the data, they discovered the findings were flawed and the theory was discarded. That, as Gingrich surely knows, is how science gets done.

If he doubts this, I’d be happy to refer him to my 2005 book, “Splendid Solution: Jonas Salk and the Conquest of Polio.” In it, I list some of the things that were once believed to cause poliomyelitis, among them: high groundwater, ice cream cones, flies, bedbugs, street dust, corn flakes, the subway, parasites in the water, alloys from cooking utensils, gasses from munitions factories, the bent-over position children assume at school desks, mercury poisoning, white clothing, earthquakes, volcanoes, electrical disturbances, sunburn, intestinal derangements, secondhand bedding, decayed food, excessive glare, unclean milk bottles, carrying coins in the mouth and tobacco.

As Gingrich notes about global cooling, many of the scientists behind such hooey were “absolutely convinced” of their theories. And many of them no doubt continued to be convinced until the truth was discovered — that the disease was caused by a virus. It was that discovery that led to the first vaccine. Does the fact that the earlier thinking was flawed lead Gingrich to doubt the legitimacy of what was established later? And for the record, it was the federal government and the local school districts that ultimately mobilized to administer polio vaccines to every child in the United States — a massive bureaucracy if ever there was one. Sometimes, Mr. Speaker, science and government know exactly what they’re doing.

Related Topics: climate science, Gingrich, global warming, National Academy of Sciences, polio, Climate Science, going green, Politics
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Don Farrall

    Falldown: Radioactive Fallout From Fukushima Posed Little Threat to the U.S.

    Nearly a year after the Japanese tsunami and subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant, the good news is that the risk from radiation doesn’t seem to be as high as many initially feared. Take the Pacific Ocean, for example, where most of the radioactive fallout from the plant eventually ended up. Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York’s Stony Brook University, took samples of the seawater three months after the accident. He found levels of radiation that were elevated, but still just a fraction of the amount of radioactivity sea life is exposed to from naturally occurring potassium in seawater.

    Nick M Do

    Gasbag: Why No President Can Bring Us $2 Gasoline

    It’s Presidents’ Day as I write this, so if you were lucky enough to have the day off, give some thanks to Washington, Lincoln and all the other chief executives — even stinkers like James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. Of course in modern American politics, every day is really Presidents’ Day — so central is the occupant of the White House to the perceived state of the nation. Good news or bad news, foreign or domestic, the President gets the credit — and he gets the blame, whether he actually deserves either.

    Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Pipeline Politics: Are the Oil Sands “Game Over” for the Climate? One Study Says No

    There are no shortage of reasons why the Keystone XL pipeline has become such a hot button issue for environmentalists. Many worry about the risks the project could pose to the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, where the pipeline was originally designed to pass. Indeed, when President Obama rejected Keystone XL in January, his stated concern was the potential threat to local water supplies.

blog comments powered by Disqus