Putting a Brand Label on Wind Power

Consumerism—perhaps more than any other factor—has driven the growth of green ideas and policies over the past decade. (Which, if you think about it, is a little ironic, but never mind that for now.) Whether it’s the near-vertical growth of the organic food movement, the spread of BPA-free bottles and other products for the concerned and conscious parent or simply the now iconic Prius hybrid, with the sleek silhouette that pronounces just how much its owner cares about the planet, green is now something we can buy. And business is good.

But one very important piece of the sustainable equation is something few of us can buy: renewable electricity. Of course, the intrepid—and the relatively well-off—can buy rooftop solar panels, and some utilities offer customers the opportunity to tack renewable energy credits onto their electricity bill, as a way to support green power. But for most of us, electricity is something that just comes out of the outlet, undifferentiated electrons that allow us to run our Playstation 3s and TiVos. It’s much more difficult to show your support for wind or solar through your consumer choices than it is to vote with your wallet for organic food or fuel-efficient transport.

That’s beginning to change, though. Today—on Global Wind Day, of course—a group of NGOs, wind companies, corporations and trade associations publicly presented WindMade, the first global consumer label for companies using wind power in their product line. The concept—which was first mooted at the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier this year—would create a standard that requires participating companies to source at least 25% of their electricity demand from wind power. The idea is that the standard would give companies an extra incentive to green their electricity portfolios. Said Steve Sawyer, the chairman of the WindMade board and the secretary-general of the Global Wind Energy Council in a statement:

The initiative is backed by the wind power industry, and we believe that the label will build a bridge between consumers and companies committed to clean energy. We hope to see widespread participation in the public consultation and strongly encourage interested parties to review and comment on the standard.

The WindMade standard is still being worked over, and it’s now entering a two-month public consultation period that should help it take shape. But this graphic—from a webinar put on earlier this morning—shows roughly how the system should work:

Eventually, the coalition behind WindMade hopes to put to be able to put a certification standard on individual products that will signal to consumers that they were made with wind power. That choice could prove a tipping point—certification standards for forestry and seafood have helped motivate sometimes reluctant industries towards more sustainable practices. Of course, the effectiveness will hinge on just how tough the wind standard ultimately is—and whether consumers show they’re willing to go out of their way to buy products with a WindMade label. As is always the case, the power—and the responsibility—for going green rests with the rest of us.

Related Topics: certification, consumerism, green business, industry, labels, organic, renewable energy, wind power, Business
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Don Farrall

    Falldown: Radioactive Fallout From Fukushima Posed Little Threat to the U.S.

    Nearly a year after the Japanese tsunami and subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant, the good news is that the risk from radiation doesn’t seem to be as high as many initially feared. Take the Pacific Ocean, for example, where most of the radioactive fallout from the plant eventually ended up. Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York’s Stony Brook University, took samples of the seawater three months after the accident. He found levels of radiation that were elevated, but still just a fraction of the amount of radioactivity sea life is exposed to from naturally occurring potassium in seawater.

    Nick M Do

    Gasbag: Why No President Can Bring Us $2 Gasoline

    It’s Presidents’ Day as I write this, so if you were lucky enough to have the day off, give some thanks to Washington, Lincoln and all the other chief executives — even stinkers like James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. Of course in modern American politics, every day is really Presidents’ Day — so central is the occupant of the White House to the perceived state of the nation. Good news or bad news, foreign or domestic, the President gets the credit — and he gets the blame, whether he actually deserves either.

    Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Pipeline Politics: Are the Oil Sands “Game Over” for the Climate? One Study Says No

    There are no shortage of reasons why the Keystone XL pipeline has become such a hot button issue for environmentalists. Many worry about the risks the project could pose to the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, where the pipeline was originally designed to pass. Indeed, when President Obama rejected Keystone XL in January, his stated concern was the potential threat to local water supplies.

blog comments powered by Disqus