Political Pollution: How Bad Air is Slowly Changing China

AFP/Getty Images
AFP/Getty Images
The smoggy Beijing skyline on January 18, 2012. China has struggled with worsening air pollution for years—and citizens are getting restless.

China confirmed this week that the number of its citizens living in cities has surpassed the rural population for the first time in its history. That massive urbanization — 690.79 million people are now city-dwellers according to the National Bureau of Statistics — has brought huge benefits, chief among them lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty. But it has also led to serious problems, perhaps none more so than the increasingly foul air in these heaving metropolises that are growing bigger, busier and dirtier by the day. In Beijing the situation has become so bad the capital’s airport has repeatedly been forced to close temporarily in recent months as dense smog prevented take-offs and landings. Meanwhile, the air has been so thick that residents have struggled to see across the road.

MORE: The China-U.S. Solar War Heats Up

Among the concerns about this well-documented public health hazard is the response — or, rather, lack of response — of the Chinese government. The controversy has centered on PM 2.5, the fine particles believed to pose the largest health risks since their small size (less than one-seventh the average width of a human hair) can lodge deeply into the lungs. The Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center has collected data on such particulate matter for the past five years but refused to make it public, preferring to release the readings of the larger PM 10 particles—which makes the air readings seem cleaner then they are.

This led to farcical situations where the government would declare the air ‘good’ or even ‘excellent’ when the opposite was true. After the U.S. embassy in downtown Beijing began releasing on Twitter hourly air quality measurements, including PM 2.5, from its rooftop monitoring station, the disparity between the two accounts was stark. In the first analysis of the embassy data on pollution, Steven Andrews, an environmental consultant based in Beijing, found in the last two years Beijing officials have announced good or even excellent air quality nearly 80% of the time, while the embassy has rated 80% of days with unhealthy levels of pollution.

Although Twitter is blocked in mainland China, Beijing residents can use virtual private networks to circumvent the censors and re-post findings on microblogs such as Sina Weibo. They can also use a mobile phone app that accesses the embassy feed, the Asia Times reports. Unsurprisingly, residents are unhappy about being kept in the dark. “As a Chinese citizen, we have been kept in the dark on this issue for too long,” Yu Ping, the father of a 7-year-old boy, who has started a public campaign to demand that officials report more accurately about Beijing’s air quality, told the New York Times last December.

MORE: Is Shark Fin Slowly Becoming Passé in Hong Kong?

Surprisingly, Beijing bowed to the pressure and began releasing hourly air pollution readings, now including PM 2.5 measurements, on Jan. 21.  State news agency Xinhua reported that they wouldn’t stop there: “In keeping with other Chinese cities’ decisions to tell the public more about airborne pollutants, the bureau will also release data about sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and larger particles.” Hong Kong and Macau will also begin to include PM 2.5 data in their air monitoring and reporting systems. Hong Kong, which suffers from embarrassingly poor air, announced this week it would attempt to meet WHO air quality standards by 2014.

The releases shows a surprising degree of responsiveness from Communist Party officials. It also suggests that, despite their slow response, some portion of the country’s leaders do realize that the state of their cities’ air could have serious repercussions on economic growth, public health and social stability.

China, now the world’s largest carbon emitter, rightly gets a hard time for its pollution. But it rarely gets credit for its unilateral moves to deal with climate change. As the Economist notes, China is trying to improve air quality dramatically in a much shorter than the 25 to 35 years it took the U.S. and Europe in the aftermath of industrialization. It also noted that the U.S. only began reporting PM 2.5 in 2002 and the European Union followed suit six years later. The country has also exceeded its most recent ambitious targets for sulfur reductions.

Meanwhile, Chinese companies dominate the solar panel industry, thanks to hefty government investment, in both manufacturing and usage in the country itself and is increasing capacity rapidly. This week the country unveiled a Second National Assessment on Climate Change that did not shirk from acknowledging the challenges ahead. It acknowledged that global warming is fed by greenhouse gases and noted that shifting land-use threatens long-term health, prosperity and food supplies. That alone won’t clear the air but, in a time of climate change-denying GOP presidential candidates, you have to admire their honesty.

MORE: The Dark Side of Steve Jobs’ Dream

Related Topics: air pollution, China, climate change, government, international, policies, China
  • Latest on Ecocentric

    Don Farrall

    Falldown: Radioactive Fallout From Fukushima Posed Little Threat to the U.S.

    Nearly a year after the Japanese tsunami and subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant, the good news is that the risk from radiation doesn’t seem to be as high as many initially feared. Take the Pacific Ocean, for example, where most of the radioactive fallout from the plant eventually ended up. Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York’s Stony Brook University, took samples of the seawater three months after the accident. He found levels of radiation that were elevated, but still just a fraction of the amount of radioactivity sea life is exposed to from naturally occurring potassium in seawater.

    Nick M Do

    Gasbag: Why No President Can Bring Us $2 Gasoline

    It’s Presidents’ Day as I write this, so if you were lucky enough to have the day off, give some thanks to Washington, Lincoln and all the other chief executives — even stinkers like James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. Of course in modern American politics, every day is really Presidents’ Day — so central is the occupant of the White House to the perceived state of the nation. Good news or bad news, foreign or domestic, the President gets the credit — and he gets the blame, whether he actually deserves either.

    Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Pipeline Politics: Are the Oil Sands “Game Over” for the Climate? One Study Says No

    There are no shortage of reasons why the Keystone XL pipeline has become such a hot button issue for environmentalists. Many worry about the risks the project could pose to the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, where the pipeline was originally designed to pass. Indeed, when President Obama rejected Keystone XL in January, his stated concern was the potential threat to local water supplies.

  • Kiersten Marek

    Reblogged this on Kmareka.com and commented:
    China is beginning to respond more to citizen outcry about poor air quality.

blog comments powered by Disqus